Palabras clave
Flujo de Trabajo
Diseño Asistido por Computadora
Materiales Dentales
Cómo citar
Copyright © | Todos los derechos reservados.
La revista posee los derechos de autor exclusivos para la publicación de este artículo en los términos de la ley brasileña 9610/98.
Reproducción parcial
El uso de partes de los textos, figuras y cuestionario del artículo es libre, siendo obligatoria la citación de los autores y revista.
Reproducción total
Está expresamente prohibido y debe ser autorizado por la revista.
Resumen
Objetivo: Discutir el flujo digital en odontología con un enfoque en los sistemas de impresión 3D, los tipos de materiales utilizados y su aplicabilidad en la clínica dental. Revisión bibliográfica: Según la literatura, el flujo de trabajo digital en Odontología a través del diseño asistido por computadora/fabricación asistida por computadora (CAD/CAM) ocurre de forma segmentada y su aplicabilidad está presente en todas las áreas de la Odontología. Las principales impresoras utilizadas son: estereolitografía (SLA), procesamiento de luz digital (DLP), pantalla de cristal líquido (LCD) y modelado por deposición fundida (FDM). Se ha demostrado que las propiedades de las piezas producidas mediante impresión 3D son similares o superiores a las producidas de forma convencional. Las impresoras DLP y SLA están más presentes en la rutina clínica, el tipo de material predominantemente utilizado son los polímeros y sus principales aplicaciones son: coronas temporales, modelos de trabajo, guías quirúrgicas, alineadores y placas miorrelajantes. Consideraciones finales: El flujo de trabajo con la aplicación de la impresión 3D tiene varias ventajas para la clínica dental, mejorando la comunicación con el paciente, reduciendo el número de sesiones clínicas, prediciendo el caso y mejorando la técnica.
Referencias
ALSHAMRANI A, et al. Effect of Printing Layer Thickness and Postprinting Conditions on the Flexural Strength and Hardness of a 3D-Printed Resin. Biomed Res Int, 2022; 2022.
BROWN G, et al. Accuracy of 3-dimensional printed dental models reconstructed from digital intraoral impressions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2018; 5: 733-739.
CAMARDELLA L, et al. Accuracy of stereolithographically printed digital models compared to plaster models. J Orofac Orthop, 2017; 5: 394-402.
CHEN S. et al. Comparison of flexural properties and cytotoxicity of interim materials printed from mono-LCD and DLP 3D printers. J Prosthet Dent, 2021; 5: 703-708.
CHEN S. et al. A Study of 3D-Printable Reinforced Composite Resin: PMMA Modified with Silver Nanoparticles Loaded Cellulose Nanocrystal. Materials (Basel), 2018; 12: 2444.
CHERNYSHIKHIN S, et al. The Study on Resolution Factors of LPBF Technology for Manufacturing Superelastic NiTi Endodontic Files. Materials (Basel), 2022; 19: 6556.
DEEB G, et al. How Accurate Are Implant Surgical Guides Produced With Desktop Stereolithographic 3-Dimentional Printers? J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2017; 12: 2559.
DEHURTEVENT M, et al. Stereolithography: A new method for processing dental ceramics by additive computer-aided manufacturing. Dent Mater, 2017; 5: 477-485.
DELLA BONA A, et al. 3D printing restorative materials using a stereolithographic technique: a systematic review. Dent Mater, 2021; 2: 336-350.
DIETRICH C, et al. A validation study of reconstructed rapid prototyping models produced by two technologies. Angle Orthod. 2017; 5: 782-787.
GRECO G, et al. Accuracy of 3-dimensional printing of dental casts: A proposal for quality standardization. J Prosthet Dent, 2022; 6: 899-910.
GRUBER K, et al. Evaluation of Inconel 718 Metallic Powder to Optimize the Reuse of Powder and to Improve the Performance and Sustainability of the Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) Process. Materials (Basel), 2021; 6: 1538.
JIN S, et al. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of dental models fabricated using additive manufacturing methods. Int J Comput Den, 2018; 2: 107-113.
KESSLER A, et al. Three-body wear of 3D printed temporary materials. Dental Materials, 2019; 12: 1805-1812.
KONIECZNY B, et al. Challenges of Co-Cr Alloy Additive Manufacturing Methods in Dentistry-The Current State of Knowledge (Systematic Review). Materials (Basel), 2020; 16: 3524.
LIU Y, et al. Accuracy of multi-implant impressions using 3D-printing custom trays and splinting versus conventional techniques for complete arches. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2019; 4: 1007–1014.
MOON W, et al. Dimensional Accuracy Evaluation of Temporary Dental Restorations with Different 3D Printing Systems. Materials (Basel), 2021; 6: 1487.
MUNOZ S, et al. Comparison of margin discrepancy of complete gold crowns fabricated using printed, milled, and conventional hand-waxed patterns. J Prosthet Dent, 2017; 1: 89-94.
OBEROI G, et al. 3D Printing-Encompassing the Facets of Dentistry. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2018; 6: 172.
OSMAN R, et al. Build Angle: Does It Influence the Accuracy of 3D-Printed Dental Restorations Using Digital Light-Processing Technology? Int J Prosthodont, 2017; 2: 182-188.
REBONG R, et al. Accuracy of three-dimensional dental resin models created by fused deposition modeling, stereolithography, and Polyjet prototype technologies: A comparative study. Angle Orthod, 2018; 3: 363-369.
REYMUS M, et al. 3D-printed material for temporary restorations: impact of print layer thickness and post-curing method on degree of conversion. Int J Comput Dent, 2019; 3: 231-237.
RIDER P. et al. Additive Manufacturing for Guided Bone Regeneration: A Perspective for Alveolar Ridge Augmentation. Int J Mol Sci, 2018; 11: 3308.
RYU J, et al. Marginal and internal fit of 3D printed provisional crowns according to build directions. J Adv Prosthodont, 2020; 4: 225-232.
TAHAYERI A, et al. 3D printed versus conventionally cured provisional crown and bridge dental materials. Dent Mater, 2018; 2: 192-200.
TAO O, et al. The Applications of 3D Printing for Craniofacial Tissue Engineering. Micromachines (Basel), 2019; 7: 480.
TAS H, et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of dental casts manufactured with 3D printing technique in the All-on-4 treatment concept. J Adv Prosthodont, 2022; 6: 379-387.
TIAN Y, et al. A Review of 3D Printing in Dentistry: Technologies, Affecting Factors, and Applications. Scanning, 2021; 9950131.
TSOLAKIS I, et al. Comparison in Terms of Accuracy between DLP and LCD Printing Technology for Dental Model Printing. Dent J (Basel), 2022; 10: 181.
TZENG J. et al. Mechanical Properties and Biocompatibility of Urethane Acrylate-Based 3D-Printed Denture Base Resin. Polymers (Basel), 2021; 5: 822.
WANG W, et al. Trueness analysis of zirconia crowns fabricated with 3-dimensional printing. J Prosthet Dent, 2019; 2: 285-291.