Resumen
Objetivo: Examinar las publicaciones sobre la interacción profesor-alumno en la educación médica. Métodos: Revisión sistemática realizada en cinco etapas: a) formulación de la pregunta de investigación; b) identificación de estudios relevantes en diversas bases de datos; c) selección de estudios; d) organización de los datos; e) resumen y síntesis de los resultados. Las bases de datos consultadas fueron Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science y Scielo, en los años 2016 - 2022. La investigación se registró en la base de datos Internacional PROSPERO (CRD 42020177029). Resultados: En la primera búsqueda se encontraron 934 artículos. Tras filtrar los duplicados, quedaron 476 estudios, cuyos títulos y resúmenes fueron analizados. Quedaron 21 artículos para el análisis del texto completo. Once estudios se incluyeron en esta revisión porque cumplían todos los criterios de elegibilidad del protocolo propuesto. Consideraciones finales: Los alumnos conceden un gran valor a las relaciones que establecen con sus profesores, incluso cuando los centros educativos utilizan métodos de enseñanza activos. El papel del profesor como facilitador en el proceso de aprendizaje proporciona una orientación segura para tratar los conocimientos que el alumno adquiere en este proceso. La interacción entre profesores y alumnos parece cambiar significativamente a lo largo del curso.
Referencias
BELFOR JA, et al. Competências pedagógicas docentes sob a percepção de alunos de medicina de universidade da Amazônia brasileira. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 2018; 23(1): 73-82.
BERNARDO WM, et al. A prática clínica baseada em evidências: parte II - buscando as Evidências em Fontes de Informação. Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia, 2004; 44(6): 403–409.
BEZERRA KKS, et al. Metodologias ativas no contexto do ensino médico no Brasil. ID on line Revista de Psicologia, 2020; 14(51): 393-407.
DEMIRKAYA PN e BAKKALOĞLU H. Examining the student-teacher relationships of children both with and without special needs in preschool classrooms. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 2015; 15(1): 159-176.
EASTON G. How medical teachers use narratives in lectures: a qualitative study. BMC Medical Education, 2016; 16(1): 3.
HENRIQUES BL, et al. Four Corners: an educational strategy for learning infectious diseases in medical school. Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica, 2021; 45(3): 1-5.
JAYASURIYA-ILLESINGHE V, et al. Role models and teachers: medical students’ perception of teaching-learning methods in clinical settings, a qualitative study from Sri Lanka. BMC Medical Education, 2016; 16(1): 52.
KEIFENHEIM KE, et al. Teaching history taking to medical students: a systematic review. BMC Medical Education, 2015; 15(1): 159.
KRALOVA E. Ethical issues in the teacher and the student relationship. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 2018; 5(3): 30-35.
KULAYLAT AN, et al. Perceptions of mistreatment among trainees vary at different stages of clinical training. BMC Medical Education, 2017; 17(1): 14.
LEVAC D, et al. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 2010; 5(69): 1-9.
LI L e YANG S. Exploring the influence of teacher-student interaction on university students’ self-efficacy in the flipped classroom. Journal of Education and Learning, 2021: 10(2): 84.
LOW MJW, et al. Cross-sectional study of perceptions of qualities of a good medical teacher among medical students from first to final year. Singapore Medical Journal, 2020; 61(1): 28-33.
MACKIN R, et al. The hidden curriculum: A good thing? Cureus, 2019; 11(12): 10-14.
MALEKI F, et al. Investigating the influence of teachers’ characteristics on the teacher-student relations from students’ perspective at Ilam University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 2017; 11(6): JC04-JC08.
MENDES KDS, et al. Revisão Integrativa: Método de pesquisa para incorporação de evidências na saúde e na enfermagem. Revista Texto e Contexto Enferm, 2008; 17(4): 758-764.
MENEZES DPF, et al. Peer mentoring como estratégia de acolhimento ao estudante e adaptação ao método PBL. Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica, 2021; 45(1): 1-6.
QUIN D. Longitudinal and contextual associations between teacher–student relationships and student engagement. Review of Educational Research, 2017; 87(2): 345-387.
SCHEI E, et al. Trustingly bewildered. How first-year medical students make sense of their learning experience in a traditional, preclinical curriculum. Medical Education Online, 2018; 23(1): 1500344.
SHARMA SK, et al. Dwindling attendance of undergraduate medical students, reasons and possible solutions. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, 2021; 10(3): 148-152.
SILVEIRA GL, et al. “Speed up”! The Influences of the hidden curriculum on the professional identity development of medical students. Health Professions Education, 2019; 5(3): 198-209.
TRICCO AC, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 2018: 169(7): 467-473.
VERITAS HEALTH INNOVATION. Covidence systematic review. Melbourne, Austrália. Disponível em: www.covidence.org. Acessado em: 30 de outubro de 2023.
VOGEL D, et al. Verbal and non-verbal communication skills including empathy during history taking of undergraduate medical students. BMC Medical Education, 2018; 18(1): 157.
WEIDMAN JC. Socialization of students in higher education: organizational perspectives. Em: The SAGE Handbook for Research in Education. [s.l.]: SAGE Publications, Inc, 2006; 252-262.
YAZDANI S, et al. A comprehensive model of hidden curriculum management in medical education. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism, 2019; 7(3): 123-130.
