Resumen
Objetivo: Realizar traducción y adaptación transcultural del cuestionario Revised University of Sidney Medical Program PBL Tutor Feedback Form para evaluar la percepción del alumno cuanto a la atuacción del tutor em la ABP. Metodos: Fueron realizadas las etapas de traducción, sínteses, retrotraducción, revisión por grupo de pesquisadores, preteste y confección de version final del cuestionario. La análisis fue realizada de forma independiente para los ciclos basico y clinico por teste de Cronbach alfa para avaliacción de la consistencia y confiabilidad interna. Fueron considerados aceptables valores ≥ 0,70. Resultados: En la comparación de las versiones retrotraduzidas com el original, hubo discrepancias semanticas discretas em seis preguntas, que tuvieron sus textos adaptados. La versión preteste fue aplicada en 32 voluntarios. La análisis de la transcripción mostró discrepancias en dos cuestiones, que fueron modificadas. El alpha de Chronbach fue de 0,924 em el cuestionario del ciclo basico y 0,950 en ciclo clinico y varió de 0,915 a 0,930 entre las cuestiones en ciclo basico y 0,946 a 0,953 en clinico. Conclusión: El cuestionario fue considerado traduzido e transculturalmente adaptado para uso em portugues brasileno, sendo útil para evaluar la percepción del tutor sob el punto de vista del discente en la ABP.
Referencias
ALMEIDA HGG, et al. Elaborando a Capacitação de Tutores: Subsídios da Prática. Rev. bras. educ. med., 2003; 27(03): 191-199.
ALOÍSIO CJ, et al. Translation and transcultural adaptation of the Instructional Materials Motivation Survey (IMMS) to brazilian portuguese. Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica, 2020; 44(4): 1-10.
ARAÚJO IM, et al. Avaliação do Aproveitamento do Aluno em Nefrologia: Estudo Comparativo entre o Método Expositivo Tradicional e o Método de Aprendizado Baseado em Problemas. Rev. bras. educ. med., 2021; 25(03): 44-55.
BACH A, et. al. Development and validation of a questionnaire on problem-based learning to evaluate facilitation by the tutor and the student group. Medical Teacher, 2023; 1-9.
BEATON DE, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2000; 25: 3186-91.
BOATENG GO, et al. Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 2018; 6: 1-18.
BORGES IM, et. al. Metodologia ativa: um paralelo entre o método PBL e o tradicional para os cursos de medicina. Conjecturas, 2022; 22(15): 876-883.
CARDOSO FL, et. al. Assessment in Problem-Based Learning (PBL): Reflections on the Process. New Trends in Qualitative Research, 2021; 8: 211–217.
COUTO LB, et al. Brazilian medical students’ perceptions of expert versus nonexpert facilitators in a (non) problem-based learning Environment. Med Educ Online, 2015; 20(1):26893.
DAS M, et al. Self and tutor evaluation in problem-based learning tutorials: is there a relationship? Medical Education. UAE University, 1998; 32(4): 411-418.
DE GRAVE WS, et al. Tutor intervention profile: reliability and validity. Medical Education, 1998;32(3): 262–268.
DE GRAVE WS, et al. Profiles of effective tutors in problem-based learning: scaffolding student learning. Medical Education, 1999; 33(12): 901-906.
DOLMANS DHJM. How theory and design-based research can mature PBL practice and research. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract, 2019; 24(5):879–891.
FELDER RM e BRENT R. Navigating the bumpy road to student-centered instruction. College Teaching, 1996;44(2): 43-47.
GOIS JA, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation of the General Comfort Questionnaire to Brazilian patients with myocardial infarction. Rev. Bras. Enferm, 71(6), 3174-81.
GUIMARÃES DL. Percepção do discente sobre a atuação do tutor especialista e não especialista na aprendizagem baseada em problemas, 2022. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ensino em Saúde) - Universidade José do Rosário Vellano, Belo Horizonte, 2022; 93p.
HAITH-COOPER M. Problem-based learning within health professional education. What is the role of the lecturer? A review of the literature. Nurse Education Today, 2000; 20(4):267-272.
HENDRY GD et al. Student evaluation of expert and non-expert problem-based learning tutors. Medical Teacher, 2002; 24(5): 544-9.
HITCHCOCK MA, MYLONA ZHE. Teaching faculty to conduct problem-based learning. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 2000; 12(1): 52-57.
ISMAIL NAS, et. al. Perception of Content and Non-Content Expert Facilitators of PBL According to Students’ Performance Levels. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 2015; 31, p. 1537-1541.
IDH. 2024. In: DADOS MUNDIAIS. DIsponível em https ://www.dadosmundiais.com/. Acessado em: 06 de março de 2024.
MARTINS AC, et al. Características do Tutor Efetivo em ABP: uma revisão de literatura. Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica, 2018; 45(1): 105-114.
MAUDSLEY G. Making sense of trying not to teach: an interview study of tutors’ ideas of problem-based learning. Academic Medicine, 2002; 77(2): 162-172.
PINTO PR, et al. Tutor performance evaluation: a feedback tool for the PBL learning process. Medical Teacher, 2001; 23(3) :289-294.
REZNICH CB e WERNER E. Facilitators’ influence on student PBL small group session online information resource use: a survey. BMC Medical Education, 2004; 4(9): 1-5.
SCHMIDT HG, et al. Influence of tutors’ subject-matter expertise on student effort and achievement in problem-based learning. Academic Medicine, 1993; 68(10): 784-791.
SOUSA VD e ROJJANASRIRAT W. Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract, 2011; 17: 268-74.
TOLEDO JR A, et al. Aprendizagem baseada em problemas: uma nova referência para a construção do currículo médico. Revista Médica de Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte, 2008; 18(2): 123-131.
WOOD DF. Problem based learning. BMJ, 2003; 326(7384): 328-330.
