Resumen
Objetivo: Analizar los hitos de funcionalidad y datos de mecánica ventilatoria de pacientes ingresados en una Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos (UCI). Métodos: Se trata de un estudio observacional, prospectivo y cuantitativo, con una búsqueda activa en las historias clínicas de pacientes mayores de 18 años y con más de 24 horas de ventilación mecánica después del ingreso a la UCI, para registrar datos demográficos, clínicos, epidemiológicos, ventilatorios. Mecánica y funcionalidad. Resultados: Se incluyeron 51 registros, con una gravedad media de 68,9 ± 20,3 en SAPS 3. El 49% realizó sentada junto a la cama, mientras que el 4% progresó a caminar. La tasa de mortalidad del 72,5% y el 84,3% de los pacientes permanecieron con una presión de conducción (DE) media inferior a 15, además del débil coeficiente de correlación para el tiempo de VM (r 0,025; p > 0,05), para el tiempo de estancia (r 0,000; p > 0,05), para la gravedad (r 0,01; p > 0,05) y para el resultado (r 0,265; p > 0,05), que se incluye en el alta o muerte en la UCI. Conclusion: Los hitos de funcionalidad y mecánica ventilatoria no presentaron asociación estadísticamente significativa con la duración de la VM, la hospitalización, la gravedad y la mortalidad de los pacientes.
Referencias
AMATO MB, et al. Driving pressure and survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372(8): 747-55.
AOYAMA H, et al. Association of Driving Pressure With Mortality Among Ventilated Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Crit Care Med. 2018; 46: 300-306.
BECERRA-MUÑOZ VM, et al. Clinical profile and predictors of in-hospital mortality among older patients hospitalised for COVID-19. Age Ageing. 2021; 50: 326-334.
BEITLER JR, et al. Ventilator-induced Lung Injury. Clin Chest Med. 2016; 37: 633-646.
BLANK RS, et al. Management of One-lung Ventilation: Impact of Tidal Volume on Complications after Thoracic Surgery. Anesthesiology. 2016; 124: 1286-95.
BROWER RG, et al. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000; 342(18): 1301-8.
CALLEGARI-JACQUES SM. Biostatistics: principles and applications. Porto Alegre: Artemed, 2003.
CHEN B, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of early mobilization therapy in patients after cardiac surgery. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021; 100: 25314.
CHEN Z, et al. Higher vs. Lower DP for Ventilated Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Emerg Med Int. 2019; 4654705.
GODINJAK, et al. Predictive value of SAPS II and APACHE II scoring systems for patient outcome in a medical intensive care unit. Acta Med Acad. 2016; 45: 97-103.
GOLIGHER EC, et al. Mechanical Ventilation-induced Diaphragm Atrophy Strongly Impacts Clinical Outcomes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018; 197: 204-213.
GUÉRIN C, et al. Effect of driving pressure on mortality in ARDS patients during lung protective mechanical ventilation in two randomized controlled trials. Crit Care. 2016; 20: 384.
LAFFEY JG, et al. Potentially modifiable factors contributing to outcome from acute respiratory distress syndrome: the LUNG SAFE study. Intensive Care Med. 2016; 42: 1865-1876.
LANSPA MJ, et al. Driving pressure is not associated with mortality in mechanically ventilated patients without ARDS. Crit Care. 2019; 23: 424.
LI Y, et al. The effect of driving pressure-guided ventilation strategy on the patients with mechanical ventilation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022; 26: 5835-5843.
LIM ZJ, et al. Case Fatality Rates for Patients with COVID-19 Requiring Invasive Mechanical Ventilation. A Meta-analysis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021; 203: 54-66.
MAO JY, et al. Fluctuations of driving pressure during mechanical ventilation indicates elevated central venous pressure and poor outcomes. Pulm Circ. 2020; 10: 2045894020970363.
MATHIS MR, et al. Intraoperative Mechanical Ventilation and Postoperative Pulmonary Complications after Cardiac Surgery. Anesthesiology. 2019; 131: 1046-1062.
MCWILLIAMS D, et al. Rehabilitation Levels in Patients with COVID-19 Admitted to Intensive Care Requiring Invasive Ventilation. An Observational Study. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021; 18: 122-129.
NETO AS, et al. Association between driving pressure and development of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for general anaesthesia: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Respir Med. 2016; 4: 272-80.
ORBAN JC, et al. Causes and Characteristics of Death in Intensive Care Units: A Prospective Multicenter Study. Anesthesiology. 2017; 126: 882-889.
PARK M, et al. Driving Pressure during Thoracic Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesthesiology. 2019; 130: 385-393.
PATON M e LANE R, et al. Early Mobilization in the Intensive Care Unit to Improve Long-Term Recovery. Crit Care Clin. 2018; 34: 557-571.
RAMIN S, et al. Driving pressure is not predictive of ARDS outcome in chest trauma patients under mechanical ventilation. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2022; 41(4): 101095.
SAHETYA SK, et al. Association between hospital mortality and inspiratory airway pressures in mechanically ventilated patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: a prospective cohort study. Crit Care. 2019; 23: 367.
SILVA VS, et al. Mobilization in the Intensive Care Unit: systematic review. Physiotherapy and Research. 2014; 21: 398-404.
SILVEIRA JÚNIOR JCD, et al. Driving pressure and mortality in trauma without acute respiratory distress syndrome: a prospective observational study. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2021; 33: 261-265.
VANHOREBEEK I, et al. ICU-acquired weakness. Intensive Care Med. 2020; 46: 637-653.
YANG Q e DU JL, et al. Mortality rate and other clinical features observed in Open vs closed format intensive care units: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019; 98: 16261.
