Resumen
Objetivo: Analizar la implementación de la evaluación basada en actividades profesionales confiables (APROC) en el programa de residencia en cirugía general de un hospital universitario. Métodos: Este fue un estudio descriptivo exploratorio. La información sobre los pasos de la implementación del nuevo método de evaluación se obtuvo de documentos institucionales. El desempeño de los residentes se extrajo de los registros académicos. Las percepciones de los residentes y preceptores sobre la evaluación basada en APROC se obtuvieron mediante un cuestionario en línea al final del proceso. Resultados: Participaron en el estudio seis residentes y ocho preceptores. Los preceptores asignaron 110 decisiones ad hoc de confianza durante el período del estudio. Un Comité de Competencia Clínica (CCC) asignó una declaración de responsabilidad otorgada a cada residente para cada APROC. El nivel de confianza esperado fue alcanzado por dos residentes de primer año en la APROC de postoperatorio y un residente de segundo año en la APROC de preoperatorio. La principal brecha de competencia fue el conocimiento de los fundamentos teóricos y el compromiso con la puntualidad y la asistencia. El análisis de la percepción mostró una amplia aceptación del nuevo método de evaluación por parte de los residentes y preceptores. La evaluación basada en APROC fue percibida como fácil de entender, justa y valiosa para promover la retroalimentación y el aprendizaje. Conclusión: La implementación de la evaluación basada en APROC en una residencia de cirugía general es factible y fue ampliamente aceptada por residentes y preceptores.
Referencias
AMARE EM, et al. Development of an Entrustable Professional Activities (EPA) framework to inform surgical residency training programs in Ethiopia: a three-round National Delphi Method Study. Journal of Surgical Education, 2022; 79(1): 56-68.
BHATTI NI, et al. Remediation of problematic residents-a national survey. The Laryngoscope, 2016; 126(4): 834-838.
BRASEL KJ, et al. Implementation of Entrustable Professional Activities in general surgery: results of a national pilot study. Annals of Surgery, 2023; 278(4): 578-586.
CONSELHO NACIONAL DE RESIDÊNCIA MÉDICA (CNRM). 1979. Resolução CNRM 05/79. Availabe at: http://portal.mec.gov.br/sesu/arquivos/pdf/CNRM0579.pdf. Accessed on: november 14, 2024.
CONSELHO NACIONAL DE RESIDÊNCIA MÉDICA (CNRM). 1978. Resolução CNRM 04/78. Available at: http://portal.mec.gov.br/sesu/arquivos/pdf/CNRM0478.pdf. Accessed on: november 14, 2024.
COLEMAN JJ, et al. Early subspecialization and perceived competence in surgical Training: are residents ready? Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2013; 216(4): 764-771.
CHOU CL, et al. Guidelines: the dos, don'ts and don't knows of remediation in medical education. Perspectives on Medical Education, 2019; 8(6): 322-338.
CHOWDHURY R e KALU G. Learning to give feedback in medical education. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist, 2004; 6(4): 243-247.
DELBONE RM e MOURA AS. Série EPAs na formação em saúde - Cadernos da residencia médica de cirurgia geral. Belo Horizonte: Faculdade Santa Casa de BH, 2022; 51 p.
DUGGAN N, et al. Using mobile technology in assessment of Entrustable Professional Activities in undergraduate medical education. Perspectives on Medical Education, 2021; 10(6): 373-377.
EL BOGHDADY M e ALIJANI A. Feedback in surgical education. The Surgeon, 2016; (15)2: 98-103.
FERREIRA MLM. Análise da implementação de um sistema de avaliação baseado em atividades profissionais confiáveis em uma residência pediátrica. Tese de Mestrado (Mestrado Profissional em Ensino em Saúde) – Universidade Professor Edson Antonio Velano, Belo Horizonte, 2022; 96p.
FRANK J, et al. Toward a definition of competency-based education in medicine: a systematic review of published definitions. Medical Teacher, 2010; 32(8): 631-637.
FRENCH JC, et al. A Systematic approach toward building a fully operational Clinical Competency Committee. Journal of Surgical Education, 2014; 7(6): e22-227.
GORDON J. Assessing students' personal and professional development using portfolios and interviews. Medical Education, 2003; 37(4): 335-340.
GUPTA A, et al. Entrustable Professional Activities: Do General Surgery Residents Trust Them? Journal of Surgical Education, 2020; 77(3): 520-526.
LINDEMAN B, et al. A phased approach: the general surgery experience adopting Entrustable Professional Activities in the United States. Academic Medicine, 2021; 96(7S): S9-S13.
MOORE D, et al. Implementing Entrustable Professional Activities: the yellow brick road towards competency-based training? ANZ. Journal of Surgery, 2017; (87)12: 1001-1005.
MULDER H, et al. Building a competency-based workplace curriculum around entrustable professional activities: The case of physician assistant training. Medical Teacher, 2010; 32(10): 453-459.
PETERS H, et al. Twelve tips for the implementation of EPAs for the assessment and entrustment decisions. Medical Teacher, 2017; 39(8): 802-807.
PIRIE J, et al. Managing residents in difficulty within CBME residency educational systems: a scoping review. BMC Medical Education, 2020; 20(235): 1-12.
STAHL CC, et al. Implementation of Entrustable Professional Activities into a General Surgery Residency. Journal of Surgical Education, 2020; 77(4): 739-748.
TEN CATE O, et al. Curriculum development for the workplace using entrustable professional activities (EPAs): AMEE guide no. 99. Medical Teacher, 2015; 37(11): 983-1002.
TEN CATE O. Entrustability of Professional Activities and Competency-Based training. Medical Education, 2005; 39(12): 1176-1177.
TEN CATE O. Guia atualizado sobre atividades profissionais confiáveis (APCs). Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica, Rio de Janeiro, 2019; 43(1): 712-720.
THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF CANADA. 2019. Entrustable Professional Activities for General Surgery, Ottawa. Available at: https://www.royalcollege.ca/content/dam/documents/accreditation/competence-by-design/non-resource-documents/epa-guide-general-surgery-e.pdf . Accessed on: Januany 23, 2024.
WAGNER JP, et al. Use of Entrustable Professional Activities in the Assessment of Surgical Resident Competency. JAMA Surgery, 2018; 153(4): 335-343.
