Resumen
Objetivo: Describir enfoques biomiméticos en la rehabilitación de un elemento dental con extensa destrucción coronaria, a través de los principios restauradores biomiméticos. Detalles del caso: Paciente de sexo femenino, de 56 años, tras evaluaciones clínicas y radiográficas del elemento dental 25, se reveló un historial de tratamiento endodóntico y extensa destrucción coronaria, presentando un pronóstico desfavorable para el uso de retenedores intrarradiculares. Ante este contexto, se optó por la rehabilitación del diente 25 utilizando una técnica restauradora indirecta basada en principios biomiméticos, asociada a la aplicación de cinta de fibra de polietileno (Ribbond) para reforzar la estructura remanente. El seguimiento clínico a lo largo de 6 meses presentó resultados clínicos satisfactorios. Consideraciones finales: El enfoque conservador en la preparación del sustrato dental, reforzando la estructura remanente del diente mediante el uso de fibra de polietileno (Ribbond) y, adicionalmente, con la restauración indirecta tipo ONLAY en resina compuesta, fue eficaz para restaurar tanto la función masticatoria como la estética del elemento dañado, contribuyendo a la longevidad clínica.
Referencias
ALSHABIB A, et al. Short fiber-reinforced resin-based composites (SFRCs); Current status and future perspectives. Dental materials journal, 2022; 41(5): 647-654.
CADENARO M, et al. Progress in dental adhesive materials. Journal of dental research, 2023; 102(3): 254-262.
CARDOSO JA, et al. Clinical guidelines for posterior restorations based on Coverage, Adhesion, Resistance, Esthetics, and Subgingival management: The CARES concept: Part I-partial adhesive restorations. International Journal of Esthetic Dentistry, 2023; 18(3).
DE KUIJPER MC, et al. Clinical performance of direct composite resin versus indirect restorations on endodontically treated posterior teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 2023; 130(3): 295-306.
DIOGUARDI M, et al. The influence of indirect bonded restorations on clinical prognosis of endodontically treated teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. dental materials, 2022; 38(8): 203-219.
FAN J, et al. Long-term clinical performance of composite resin or ceramic inlays, onlays, and overlays: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Operative Dentistry, 2021; 46(1): 25-44.
JOSIC U, et al. Clinical longevity of direct and indirect posterior resin composite restorations: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Dental Materials, 2023.
LOPES LCP, et al. Heating and preheating of dental restorative materials—a systematic review. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2020; 24: 4225-4235.
MARAVIĆ T, et al. Resin composite cements: current status and a novel classification proposal. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 2023; 35(7): 1085-1097.
MELO MAS, et al. Developing bioactive dental resins for restorative dentistry. Journal of Dental Research, 2023; 102(11): 1180-1190.
NETO JM, et al. Utilização de resinas compostas em dentes anteriores. Revista Eletrônica Acervo Saúde, 2021; 13(2): 6583.
OLIVEIRA NMA. Restauração biomimética em dente tratado endodonticamente: relato de caso. Programa de Pós Graduação em Dentística – FACSETE, 2022; 32.
OZER F, et al. Effect of Immediate Dentin Sealing on the Bonding Performance of Indirect Restorations: A Systematic Review. Biomimetics, 2024; 9(3): 182.
PARYANI M, et al. Evolution of Biomimetic Approaches for Regenerative and Restorative Dentistry. Cureus, 2023; 15(1).
PETYK WS, et al. Assessment of fracture resistance capacity in endodontically treated teeth with fiberglass post comparing different therapeutic techniques. Rev Uningá. 2023; 60: 4425.
REYES SKG, et al. Performance of Fiberglass Posts Versus Fiber-Reinforced Resin Composites in Endodontically Treated Anterior Teeth Without Ferrule: A Systematic Review. The European journal of prosthodontics and restorative dentistry. 2024.
RODOLPHO PAR, et al. Clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations after up to 33 years. Dent Mat, 2022; 38(4): 680-688.
SARKIS-ONOFRE R, et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing glass fiber posts and cast metal posts. Journal of dentistry, 2020; 96: 103334.
SELVARAJ H, et al. Systematic review fracture resistance of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with fiber reinforced composites-a systematic review. BMC Oral Health, 2023; 23(1): 566.
SINGER L, et al Biomimetic approaches and materials in restorative and regenerative dentistry. BMC Oral Health, 2023; 23(1): 105.
VOLOM A, et al. Fatigue performance of endodontically treated molars reinforced with different fiber systems. Clinical oral investigations, 2023; 27(6): 3211-3220.
ZAFAR MS, et al. Biomimetic aspects of restorative dentistry biomaterials. Biomimetics, 2020; 5(3): 34.
