Resumen
Objetivo: Identificar lo que la literatura actual aborda sobre la aplicabilidad de la punción intraósea en el paro cardiorrespiratorio. Métodos: Se trata de una revisión integrativa de la literatura. La búsqueda se realizó en la base de datos PubMed utilizando descriptores específicos, limitando los resultados a publicaciones entre 2015 y 2025. Se identificaron 180 artículos indexados en PubMed. Tras aplicar los criterios de inclusión y exclusión, 18 artículos conformaron la muestra final. Resultados: Los hallazgos indican que la punción intraósea (IO) es una vía de acceso rápida y segura en escenarios donde la obtención del acceso intravenoso (IV) resulta difícil; sin embargo, no presenta superioridad en desenlaces como el retorno de la circulación espontánea, la supervivencia o el pronóstico neurológico. Consideraciones finales: La punción intraósea representa una alternativa segura y eficaz al acceso intravenoso en situaciones de paro cardiorrespiratorio, especialmente cuando existe dificultad para obtener acceso venoso. Aunque no demuestra superioridad en los principales desenlaces clínicos, su uso precoz puede optimizar el tiempo de respuesta durante la reanimación. Las guías internacionales mantienen el acceso intravenoso como la primera opción, indicando el acceso intraóseo en casos de difícil acceso vascular. Se destaca la importancia de la capacitación continua de los profesionales y del fortalecimiento de la investigación nacional para respaldar su uso seguro en los servicios de urgencias y emergencias.
Referencias
AGOSTINUCCI JM, et al. Evolution of the use of intraosseous vascular access in prehospital advanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation: the IOVA-CPR study. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 2024; 30(5): e13244.
BERNOCHE C, et al. Atualização da Diretriz de Ressuscitação Cardiopulmonar e Cuidados Cardiovasculares de Emergência da Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia – 2019. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, 2019; 113(3): 449–663.
BREBNER C, et al. The association of intravenous vs humeral intraosseous vascular access with patient outcomes in adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. Resuscitation, 2024; 202: 110360.
BURGOS-ESTEBAN A, et al. Epidemiology, use, and practice of the intraosseous route in an out-of-hospital emergency department: a retrospective cross-sectional study. Frontiers in Public Health, 2024; 12: 1375431.
DAYA MR, et al. Survival after intravenous versus intraosseous amiodarone, lidocaine, or placebo in out-of-hospital shock-refractory cardiac arrest. Circulation, 2020; 141(3): 188–198.
FERREIRA KC, et al. Vantagens e limitações do uso do acesso intraósseo nas urgências e emergências: revisão integrativa. Saúde Coletiva, 2020; 10(59): 4272–4285.
GAGNON S, et al. Easy with the IO: intravenous versus intraosseous access in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2025; 27(7): 521–523.
KIM Y, et al. The efficacy of intraosseous access for initial resuscitation in patients with severe trauma: a retrospective multicenter study in South Korea. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2024; 13(13): 3702.
KO YC, et al. Intraosseous versus intravenous vascular access in upper extremity among adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: cluster randomized clinical trial (VICTOR trial). BMJ, 2024; 386: e079878.
KUDO H, et al. Association between intraosseous access establishment and prehospital vasopressor administration in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in helicopter emergency medical services. Air Medical Journal, 2025; 44(5): 399–403.
LEIDEL BA, et al. Comparison of intraosseous versus central venous vascular access in adults under resuscitation in the emergency department with inaccessible peripheral veins. Resuscitation, 2012; 83(1): 40–45.
MENDES KDS, et al. Revisão integrativa: método de pesquisa para a incorporação de evidências na saúde e na enfermagem. Texto & Contexto Enfermagem, 2008; 17(4): 758–764.
NACER DT, et al. Desfechos após parada cardiorrespiratória extra-hospitalar de natureza clínica e traumática. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, 2023; 120(7): e20220551.
NILSSON FN, et al. Association of intraosseous and intravenous access with patient outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Scientific Reports, 2023; 13(1): 48350.
NWEZE K, et al. Successful intraosseous thrombolysis in the management of a massive pulmonary embolism with cardiac arrest. Cureus, 2020; 12(12): e12105.
OKUBO M, et al. Intraosseous vs intravenous access for epinephrine in pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA Network Open, 2025; 8(6): e2517291.
PANCHAL AR, et al. 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care: Adult Basic and Advanced Life Support. Circulation, 2020; 142(16 Suppl 2): S366–S468.
PREIS LC. Construção e validação de um protocolo assistencial interdisciplinar de punção intraóssea em pacientes adultos e pediátricos. Tese (Doutorado). Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina; 2018.
SAMPSON C. Extravasation from a misplaced intraosseous catheter. Clinical Practice and Cases in Emergency Medicine, 2019; 3(3): 303–304.
SINGH A, SINGH D. A case of compartment syndrome due to out-of-hospital intraosseous misplacement during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Cureus, 2022; 14(6): e26228.
VADEYAR S, et al. Trends in use of intraosseous and intravenous access in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest across English ambulance services. Resuscitation, 2023; 191: 109951.
VAKIL HS, AHMED M. Enhancing utilization of intraosseous vascular access in cardiac arrest management: insights from a retrospective study. Cureus, 2024; 16(11): e74710.
VALLENTIN MF, et al. Intraosseous vs intravenous access during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a bayesian secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. Resuscitation, 2025; 212: 110634.
YANG CH, et al. Intraosseous and intravenous epinephrine administration routes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: survival and neurologic outcomes. Journal of the American Heart Association, 2024; 13(21): e031739.
