Keywords
Diagnosis
Cervical Cancer
Adherence
How to Cite
Copyright © | All rights reserved.
The journal holds the exclusive copyright for the publication of this article under the terms of Brazilian law 9610/98.
Partial reproduction
The use of parts of the texts, figures and questionnaire of the article is free, being mandatory the citation of the authors and journal.
Total reproduction
It is expressly prohibited and must be authorized by the journal.
Abstract
Objective: To establish which are the factors that interfere positively and negatively in women's adherence to the Papanicolaou test. Methods: This is a cross-sectional quali-quantitative study, conducted with 233 women, based on a socioeconomic questionnaire consisting of 9 questions and a knowledge assessment questionnaire, consisting of 5 questions. Therefore, responses from women between 25 and 65 years of age, residing in the state of São Paulo, who had already had sexual intercourse and who did not have a previous diagnosis of Cervical Cancer, were accepted. Results: Of the women who declared that it was important to have the Pap smear, 98.7% did it, while among those who did not believe it was important, the rate was only 0%. Women who had religion beliefs were positively associated with carrying out the preventive examination. The factors that did not interfere with the performance of the test because there was no statistically significant association were: wage income and education. Conclusion: It is concluded that the factors positively associated with adherence to the Papanicolaou test are: knowledge about its importance and having religion beliefs.
References
BARROS KB, et al. A importância do conhecimento nas escolas sobre o HPV: uma revisão narrativa, Revista Eletrônica Acervo Saúde, 2021; 13(4): e6934.
BILGER M, et al. Demand for Cancer Screening Services: Results From Randomized Controlled Discrete Choice Experiments. Value in Health, 2020; 23 (9): 1246–1255.
CARRASQUILLO O, et al. HPV Self-Sampling for Cervical Cancer Screening Among Ethnic Minority Women in South Florida: a Randomized Trial. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2018; 33(7): 1077–1083.
CONZA EMH, et al. Detección oportuna de cáncer cérvico-uterino. Revista Vive, 2021; 3(9): 264–74.
DANTAS PVJ, et al. Women’s knowledge and factors of not adherence to the pap smear examination. Revista de Enfermagem UFPE on line, 2018; 12(3): 684.
EGHBAL SB, et al. Evaluating the effect of an educational program on increasing cervical cancer screening behavior among rural women in Guilan, Iran. BMC Women’s Health, 2020; 20(1): 149.
FELISBINO-MENDES MS, et al. Análise dos indicadores de saúde sexual e reprodutiva de adolescentes brasileiros, 2009, 2012 e 2015. Ver. Bra. Epidemiol., 2018; 21(1): 1-14.
GURGEL, LC et al. Percepção de mulheres sobre o exame de prevenção de colo de útero Papanicolau: Uma Revisão Integrativa da Literatura. REVISTA DE PSICOLOGIA, 2019; 13(46): 434–45.
INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE CÂNCER JOSÉ ALENCAR GOMES DA SILVA (INCA). Atlas da mortalidade. 2022. Disponível em: https://www.inca.gov.br/app/mortalidade. Acessado em: 11 de abril de 2023.
INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE CÂNCER JOSÉ ALENCAR GOMES DA SILVA. Estimativa 2023: incidência do Câncer no Brasil. 2022. Disponível em: https://www.inca.gov.br/sites/ufu.sti.inca.local/files/media/document/estimativa-2023.pdf. Acessado em: 11 de abril de 2023.
INSTITUTO NACIONAL DO CÂNCER (Brasil). Estatísticas de câncer. Estatísticas de câncer. 2021. Disponível em: https://www.inca.gov.br/numeros-de-cancer. Acessado em: 28 de abril de 2023.
KIM HW, et al. Effect of community-based education to Korean mothers in relation to the prevention of cervical cancer in their daughters: A non-randomized trial. Jpn J Nurs Sci., 2018; 15(2):146-155.
KOÇ Z, et al. The Impact of Education About Cervical Cancer and Human Papillomavirus on Women’s Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors and Beliefs: Using the PRECEDE Educational Model. Cancer Nursing, 2019; 42(2): 106–118.
MELO EMF, et al. Cervical cancer: knowledge, attitude and practice on the prevention examination. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 2019; 72(3): 25–31.
NOLAN TS, et al. The ties that bind: Cancer history, communication, and screening intention associations among diverse families. Journal of Medical Screening, 2021; 28 (2): 108–113.
NWABICHIE CC, et al. Factors Affecting Uptake of Cervical Cancer Screening Among African Women in Klang Valley, Malaysia. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 2018; 19(3).
OLIVEIRA JLT, et al. Perfil sociodemográfico e citológico de mulheres em investigação de neoplasia cérvico-uterina em um serviço secundário. Nursing, 2023; 26(303): 9854–60.
REQUES L, et al. Comparison of cervical cancer screening by self-sampling papillomavirus test versus pap-smear in underprivileged women in France. BMC Women’s Health, 2021; 21(1): 221.
ROMLI R, et al. Effectiveness of a Health Education Program to Improve Knowledge and Attitude Towards Cervical Cancer and Pap Smear: A Controlled Community Trial in Malaysia. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 2020; 21(3): 853–859.
SANTOS JN e GOMES RS. Sentidos e Percepções das Mulheres acerca das Práticas Preventivas do Câncer do Colo do Útero: Revisão Integrativa da Literatura. Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia, 2022; 68(2).
SHEN J, et al. Cost of HPV screening at community health campaigns (CHCs) and health clinics in rural Kenya. BMC Health Services Research, 2018; 18(1): 378.
SILVA GA, et al. Avaliação das ações de Controle do Câncer de Colo de Útero no Brasil e Regiões a Partir dos Dados Registrados no Sistema Único de Saúde. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 2022; 38(7): e00041722.
SILVA LA, et al. Conhecimento e prática de mulheres atendidas na atenção primária a saúde sobre o exame Papanicolau. Rev. Pesqui. (Univ. Fed. Estado Rio J., Online), 2021; 13: 1013–1019.
SILVA MA, et al. Fatores que na visão da mulher, interferem no diagnóstico precoce do câncer do colo do útero. Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia, 2018; 64(1): 99-106.
SOUSA ML, et al. Câncer de colo do útero: sinais e sintomas na Atenção Primária à Saúde. Research, Society and Development, 2022; 11(13): e591111335891.
TEIXEIRA, JC et al. Câncer Cervical Registrado em Duas Regiões Desenvolvidos do Brasil: Limite Superior de Resultados Atingíveis de Triagem Oportunista. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, 2018; 6: 347–353.
VALDEZ A, et al. A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Cervical Cancer Education Intervention for Latinas Delivered Through Interactive, Multimedia Kiosks. Journal of Cancer Education, 2018; 33(1): 222–230.