Google Scholar | Citations: 16429| h-index: 32 | i10-index: 482
Validation of a simulation model for training in tympanotomy and ventilation tube insertion
PDF (Portuguese (Brazil))

Keywords

Medical education
Otolaryngology
Health education
Ventilation tube insertion

How to Cite

Validation of a simulation model for training in tympanotomy and ventilation tube insertion. (2025). Electronic Journal Collection Health, 25(9), e21636. https://doi.org/10.25248/reas.e21636.2025

Copyright © | All rights reserved.

The journal holds the exclusive copyright for the publication of this article under the terms of Brazilian law 9610/98.

Partial reproduction
The use of parts of the texts, figures and questionnaire of the article is free, being mandatory the citation of the authors and journal.

Total reproduction
It is expressly prohibited and must be authorized by the journal.

Abstract

Objective: Validate a simulator for training and learning tympanotomy and ventilation tube insertion in the Otorhinolaryngology residency.  Methods: This is a cross-sectional and descriptive study through the evaluation of the simulator by 16 otolaryngologists and 12 residents in Otorhinolaryngology using a form adapted to the Michigan Standard Simulation Experience Scale (MiSSES). Results: The simulator was positively evaluated by expert judges (91.46%) and resident doctors (93.61%), with an overall average score of 8.94 and 9.17, respectively. The points with the lowest agreement among experts were: interface (85.42%), aesthetic evaluation (85.42%) and presence of anatomical references (83.33%). Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.79 among specialists and the degree of satisfaction with the training was high with 92.48% agreement among resident doctors. Conclusion: The tympanotomy and insertion of ventilation simulator was validated by expert judges and resident doctors and, together with theoretical-practical training, constitutes an enhanced educational tool for the development of surgical skills in Otorhinolaryngology.

PDF (Portuguese (Brazil))

References

AGGARWAL R, et al. Training and simulation for patient safety. Qual Saf Care, 2010; 19(2): 34-43.

BENTO RF, et al. Otobone: three-dimensional printed temporal bone biomodel for simulation of surgical procedures. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2019; 23(4): 451-454.

BRASIL. MINISTÉRIO DA SAÚDE. Conselho Nacional de Saúde. Resolução nº 466, de 12 de dezembro de 2012. Aprova as diretrizes e normas regulamentadoras de pesquisa envolvendo seres humanos. Brasília; 2012.

CHAN AL, et al. Simulation platform for myringotomy with ventilation tube insertion in adult ears. Philipp J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2018; 33: 14-20.

CHANG DR, et al. Fabrication and validation of a low-cost, medium-fidelity silicone injection molded endoscopic sinus surgery simulation model. Laryngoscope, 2017; 127(4): 781-6.

CLARK MP, et al. An endoscopic Ear Trainer for the low-resource setting. J Laryngol Oto, 2019; 133: 571-4.

COSTA SS, et al. URTI Guideline: upper respiratory tract infections [in Portuguese]. Wolters Kluwer Health. Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial, 2007.

COSTA GOF, et al. Validation of a Training Model for Performing Laparoscopic Knots and Stitches in a Simulation Environment. Rev Bras Educ Medica Online, 2020; 44(2): 54.

CULLEN KA, et al. Ambulatory surgery in the United States, 2006. Natl Health Stat Rep, 2009; 1: 1-25.

DE SOUZA M, et al. Three-dimensional printing in otolaryngology education: a systematic review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2022; 279(4): 1709-19.

DENTON O, et al. Investigating the learning curve in endoscopic compared to microscopic myringotomy and ventilation tube insertion. J Laryngol Otol, 2020; 134: 497-500.

DUIJVESTEIN M e BORGSTEIN J. The Bradford grommet trainer. Clin Otolaryngol, 2006; 31(2): 163.

FLORES CD, et al. The use of simulation in medical education [in Portuguese]. RBIE, 2014; 22: 98-108.

GADALETA DJ, et al. 3D printed temporal bone as a tool for otologic surgery simulation. Am J Otolaryngol, 2020; 41: 102273.

HONG P, et al. An anatomically sound surgical simulation model for myringotomy and tympanostomy tube insertion. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2014; 78(3): 522-9.

HOVGAARD LH, et al. Current Evidence for Simulation-Based Training and Assessment of Myringotomy and Ventilation Tube Insertion: A Systematic Review. Otol Neurotol, 2021; 42(9): 1188-1196.

HUANG C, et al. Automated metrics in a virtual-reality myringotomy simulator: development and construct validity. Otol Neurotol, 2018; 39: 601-608.

HUANG C, et al. Face and content validity of a virtual-reality simulator for myringotomy with tube placement. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2015; 44: 40.

JESUDASON WV e SMITH I. How we do it: the Bradford grommet trainer: a model for training in myringotomy and grommet insertion. Clin Otolaryngol, 2005; 30: 371-3.

JUNIOR G e GUEDES H. Simulação em Saúde para Ensino e Avaliação: Conceitos e Práticas. São Carlos: Cubo Multimídia, 2021; 254.

LEE AY, et al. Improving rhinology skills with simulation. Otolaryngol Clin Am, 2017; 50(5): 893-901.

LUNA RA e SPIGHT D. Simulation in medical education: a necessary change. Rev HUPE, 2014; 13: 57-61.

LUU K, et al. Evaluation of a low-fidelity ear surgery simulator in a low-resource setting. J Laryngol Otol, 2017; 131: 1010-6.

MAHALINGAM S, et al. Ventilation tube insertion simulation: a literature review and validity assessment of five training models. Clin Otolaryngol, 2016; 41(4): 321-6.

MALEKZADEH S, et al. A Model for Training and Evaluation of Myringotomy and Tube Placement Skills. Laryngoscope, 2011; 121: 1410-5.

McMILLAN A, et al. Comparison of materials used for 3D-printing temporal bone models to simulate surgical dissection. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 2020; 129(12): 1168-73.

MOLIN N, et al. Low cost, easy-to-replicate myringotomy tube insertion simulation model. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2020; 131: 109847.

MUSBAHI O, at al. Current status of simulation in otolaryngology: a systematic review. J Surg Educ, 2017; 74: 203-15.

PAPADATOU-PASTOU M, et al. Human handedness: A meta-analysis. Psychol Bull, 2020; 146(6): 481-524.

PAZIN FILHO A e SCARPELINI S. Simulation: definition. Med (Ribeirao Preto), 2007; 40: 162-6.

PURAM SV, et al. Impact of resident surgeons on procedure length based on common pediatric otolaryngology cases. Laryngoscope, 2015; 125(4): 991-7.

ROSENFELD RM, et al. Clinical practice guideline: Tympanostomy tubes in children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2013; 149(1): 1-35.

SCHEFFER M, et al. Demografia Médica no Brasil 2023. São Paulo, SP: FMUSP, AMB, 2023; 344.

SEAGULL FJ e ROONEY DM. Filling a void: developing a standard subjective assessment tool for surgical simulation through focused review of current practices. Surgery, 2014; 156(3): 718-22.

SHENTON C e AUCOTT W. How I do it: a simulator of the ear for developing otomicroscopy skills during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. J Laryngol Otol, 2020: 1-4.

TESTA JR, et al. Avaliação de Resultados e Complicações da Cirurgia de Colocação de Tubos de Ventilação em Pacientes com Otite Media Serosa. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2010; 14(1): 90-4.

VAITAITIS VJ, et al. A Surgical Simulator for Tympanostomy Tube Insertion Incorporating Capacitive Sensing Technology to Track Instrument Placement. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2020; 162(3): 343-5.

WALKER T, et al. The Wigan grommet trainer. Clin Otolaryngol, 2006; 31: 349-50.

WONG V, et al Construct validation of a printed bone substitute in otologic education. Otol Neurotol, 2019; 40(7): 698-703.

YUSOFF MSB. ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. Educ Med J, 2019; 11(2): 49-54.