Google Scholar | Citations: 16429| h-index: 32 | i10-index: 482
Comparison between the detection test for Human Papillomavirus in the uterine cervix and the outcomes of patients treated at a colposcopy clinic in a public hospital in the Federal District
PDF (Portuguese (Brazil))

Keywords

DNA tests for human papillomavirus
Cervical neoplasms
Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

How to Cite

Comparison between the detection test for Human Papillomavirus in the uterine cervix and the outcomes of patients treated at a colposcopy clinic in a public hospital in the Federal District. (2025). Electronic Journal Collection Health, 25, e19902. https://doi.org/10.25248/reas.e19902.2025

Copyright © | All rights reserved.

The journal holds the exclusive copyright for the publication of this article under the terms of Brazilian law 9610/98.

Partial reproduction
The use of parts of the texts, figures and questionnaire of the article is free, being mandatory the citation of the authors and journal.

Total reproduction
It is expressly prohibited and must be authorized by the journal.

Abstract

Objective: To correlate the results of self-collected DNA-HPV tests with cytological and histological changes in patients from a specialized clinic. Methods: This is a retrospective, quantitative, cross-sectional, descriptive, and observational study conducted with patients aged 25 to 64 years at a colposcopy clinic in a public hospital in the Federal District. The patients had abnormal oncotic cytology results and underwent the self-test for DNA-HPV between May 2023 and May 2024. Results: Of the 191 patients included in the study, 57.1% were aged between 30 and 49 years. DNA-HPV testing was positive in 65.4% of the cases. Among the HPV-positive patients, the most prevalent histopathological result was NIC2/3. This relationship was statistically significant in patients aged 30 to 49 years (p-value 0.049) and those over 50 years old (p-value 0.006), but not in patients under 29 years old (p-value 0.164). Conclusion: The HPV test can be used to guide the treatment of patients with abnormal cytology, thus selecting those who require more or less invasive measures.

PDF (Portuguese (Brazil))

References

ALI M, et al. HPV DNA status and clinical history of patients are supplements for accurate reporting of the cytological Pap smear. Sci Rep., 2024; 14: 174-186.

ARBYN M, et al. Accuracy of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol., 2014; 15(2): 172–183.

AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF HEALTHCARE AND WELFARE. Cervical screening in Australia. 2019.

BRASIL. Diretrizes Brasileiras para o Rastreamento do Câncer do Colo de útero. Rio de Janeiro: INCA, 2016; 2.

CARVALHO CF, et al. Cervical Cancer Screening with HPV testing: Updates on the recommendation. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet., 2022; 44(3): 264–271.

CHAN KKL, et al. PAX1/SOX1 DNA methylation versus cytology and HPV16/18 genotyping for the triage of high-risk HPV-positive women in cervical cancer screening: Retrospective analysis of archival samples. BJOG, 2025; 132: 197-204.

DIMITROVA M, et al. Economic consequences of the implementation of primary DNA-HPV genotype testing in Bulgaria. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip., 2024; 38(1): 2358134.

EFFAH K, et al. Cervical precancer screening using self-sampling, HPV DNA testing, and mobile colposcopy in a hard-to-reach community in Ghana: a pilot study. BMC Cancer, 2024; 24: 1367.

EKAWATI FM, et al. Cervical cancer screening program in Indonesia: is it time for HPV-DNA tests? Results of a qualitative study exploring the stakeholders’ perspectives. BMC Women's Health, 2024; 24: 125.

FONSECA FV, et al. Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: Analyzing the Disease Present Exclusively in the Endocervical Canal. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, 2022; 44(4): 385–390.

GRCE M, DAVIES P. Human papillomavirus testing for primary cervical cancer screening. Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics 2008; 8(5): 599-605.

GUPTA C, et al. Evaluating different samples & techniques for hr-HPV DNA genotyping to improve the efficiency of risk profiling for oral & cervical cancers in Sikkim, India. Indian J Med Res., 2024; 160(2): 226-235.

JANSEN EEL, et al. Effect of organisef cervical cancer mortality in Europe: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer, 2020; 127: 207-223.

JUNG Y, et al. Clinical factors that affect diagnostic discrepancy between colposcopically directed biopsies and loop electrosurgical excision procedure conization of the uterine cervix. Obstet Gynecol Sci., 2018; 61(4): 477–483.

KITTISIAM T, et al. Clinical Performance of Self-collected Specimen HPV-DNA vs Clinician-collected Specimen HPV-mRNA to Detect High-risk HPV and High-grade Cervical Lesions and Cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev., 2024; 25(1): 211-217.

LIM LM, et al. Self-sampling HPV DNA test for cervical cancer screening in Singapore: A prospective study. Ann Acad Med Singap., 2022; 51(11): 733–735.

ARAUJO ACM, et al. Nota Técnica No 41/2024-CGICI/DPNI/SVSA/MS. 2024.

MIGLIORELLI A, et al. Circulating HPV Tumor DNA and Molecular Residual Disease in HPV-Positive Oropharyngeal Cancers: A Scoping Review. Diagnostics, 2024; 14(23): 2662.

OKADA PA, et al. External quality assessment program for human papillomaviruses DNA testing in Thailand. Pract Lab Med., 2024; 38: e00352.

PERERA KCM, et al. Prevalence of vaginal and cervical HPV infection among 35-year age cohort ever-married women in Kalutara district of Sri Lanka and the validity of vaginal HPV/DNA specimen as a cervical cancer screening tool: a cross-sectional study. BMC Infect Dis., 2024; 24: 1249.

PEREIRA NCF, et al. Sobretratamento excisional ambulatorial do colo uterino: histologia negativa para atipias. Revista Eletrônica Acervo Saúde, 2024; 24(2): e15936.

PRZYBYLSKI M, et al. Evaluation of Automatic Signal Detection of In Situ Hybridization for Detecting HPV DNA in Cervical Tissue Derived from Patients with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia. Cancers (Basel), 2024; 16(20): 3485.

SANTI M, et al. Prevalence of hr-HPV genotypes among vaccinated and unvaccinated women in central Italy: a retrospective study. Acta Biomed., 2024.

SCHIFFMAN M, et al. Carcinogenic human papillomavirus infection. Nat Rev Dis Primers, 2016; 2: 16086.

SCHEIBERHUBER L, et al. Cervical cancer screening using DNA methylation triage in a real-world population. Nat Med., 2024; 30(8): 2251-2257.

TEIXEIRA JC, et al. Cervical cancer screening program based on primary DNA-HPV testing in a Brazilian city: a cost-effectiveness study protocol. BMC Public Health, 2020; 20: 576.

TEIXEIRA JC, et al. Cervical Cancer Screening with DNA-HPV Testing and Precancerous Lesions Detection: A Brazilian Population-based Demonstration Study. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet., 2023; 45(1): 21–30.

TEIXEIRA JC, et al. Transition from opportunistic cytological to organized screening program with DNA-HPV testing detected prevalent cervical cancers 10 years in advance. Sci Rep., 2024; 14: 20761.

TERÁN-FIGUEROA Y, et al. Coleta de amostra para identificação de DNA do papilomavírus: conhecimento e habilidades. Acta Paul Enferm., 2019; 32(5): 514-20.

WRIGHT TC, et al. "The ATHENA Human Papillomavirus Study: The Impact of HPV Testing on Clinical Management of Cervical Cytology Abnormalities." Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2015; 126(3): 453-459.

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. Comprehensive Cervical Cancer Control: A guide to essential practice. WHO Library; 2021.

ZHOU Y, et al. Correlations between C-myc expression, BMI-1 expression, and vaginal microecology with HPV-DNA load in patients with different cervical lesions. Am J Transl Res., 2024; 16(6): 2544-2553.