Keywords
Artificial intelligence
Teaching
How to Cite
Copyright © | All rights reserved.
The journal holds the exclusive copyright for the publication of this article under the terms of Brazilian law 9610/98.
Partial reproduction
The use of parts of the texts, figures and questionnaire of the article is free, being mandatory the citation of the authors and journal.
Total reproduction
It is expressly prohibited and must be authorized by the journal.
Abstract
Objective: Reflect artificial intelligence (IA) as a learning tool in the drafting of criminal legal documents. Literature review: The integration of AI into the legal education process offers new possibilities for the development of students' critical and technical reasoning, especially within the scope of Criminal Law. AI tools, such as writing assistants, jurisprudential suggestion mechanisms, and textual analysis, can collaborate in the construction of more structured procedural documents and in the identification of legal theses with greater argumentative coherence. The use of artificial intelligence in the preparation of criminal filings represents a significant step towards the optimization of legal processes, combining agility with argumentative precision. Another aspect of extreme relevance of AI is the training of law professionals. The integration of AI into the legal education process offers new possibilities for the development of students’ critical and technical reasoning, especially in the field of criminal law. Final considerations: The capacity of these systems to analyze large volumes of legal data, identify argumentative patterns, and suggest coherent structures contributes to the elaboration of more precise and well-founded documents.
References
ANGWIN J, et al. Machine Bias: There’s software used across the country to predict future criminals. And it’s biased against blacks. ProPublica, 2016.
CALISKAN-ISLAM A e NARAYANAN A. Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases. Science, 2016; 356(6334): 183–186.
CATH C, et al. Artificial Intelligence and the ‘Good Society’: the US, EU, and UK approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2018; 24(2): 505–528.
DEEKE A. Transparência algorítmica e responsabilidade jurídica: desafios para o Direito Penal. Revista Jurídica da FGV, 2023; 19(2): 102-119.
DIVINO A C. Inteligência artificial e Direito Penal: desafios à proteção dos direitos fundamentais. Revista de Estudos Criminais, 2021; 21(81): 87-108.
EUBANKS V. Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2018.
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT. European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2017 with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015/2103(INL)). Official Journal of the European Union, 2017.
FENOLL JN. Inteligência artificial e processo penal: riscos e oportunidades. Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, 2018; 4(1): 75-94.
KALLAS S. Inteligência Artificial aplicada ao Direito: possibilidades e desafios na formação jurídica. Revista Brasileira de Ensino Jurídico, 2020; 6(2): 45-63.
LEE D, et al. Generative Legal Reasoning: The Role of AI in Simulating Complex Adversarial Arguments. arXiv, 2025; 54(3): 2502-2510.
LEMOS R. Inteligência Artificial, Direito e Democracia. Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas, 2022; 12(1): 33-49.
MACHADO T. A inteligência artificial e a transformação da prática jurídica: impactos na produção de peças processuais. Revista Direito e Tecnologia, 2021; 3(1): 112-130.
MANTOVANI F. Inteligência Artificial e Direito Penal: uma análise das implicações jurídicas e éticas. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Criminais, 2020; 153: 187–210.
MEIRA S. Direito e Tecnologia: uma agenda crítica para o século XXI. Revista de Direito, Estado e Sociedade, 2020; 58: 75-94.
MONAHAN J e SKEEM JL. Risk assessment in criminal sentencing: Science and practice. Law and Human Behavior, 2019; 43(1): 15–21.
MURPHY R e RYAN T. Artificial Intelligence in Formative Assessment: A Systematic Review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2024; 45(1): 253-261.
RAZ J. The Law’s Own Virtue. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2019; 39(1): 1–16.
SILVA AB e COSTA JM. The Educator's Role in the Age of AI: From Knowledge Transmitter to Critical Mediator. International Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 2024; 74(4): 121-134.
SOUSA L e OLIVEIRA F. O uso de inteligência artificial no ensino jurídico: análise de ferramentas e implicações éticas. Revista de Educação Jurídica Contemporânea, 2022; 4(1): 55-70.
STARR S B. Evidence-Based Sentencing and the Scientific Rationalization of Discrimination. Stanford Law Review, 2013; 66(4): 803–812.
WANG C, et al. Adaptive Learning Systems in Legal Education: A Data-Driven Approach. arXiv, 2023; 45(3): 2305-2312.
ZHANG M, et al. Challenges and Opportunities in AI-Based Legal Tutoring Systems. arXiv, 2020; 23(1): 2001-2009.