Keywords
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Teaching learning
Nursing
How to Cite
Copyright © | All rights reserved.
The journal holds the exclusive copyright for the publication of this article under the terms of Brazilian law 9610/98.
Partial reproduction
The use of parts of the texts, figures and questionnaire of the article is free, being mandatory the citation of the authors and journal.
Total reproduction
It is expressly prohibited and must be authorized by the journal.
Abstract
Objective: To synthesize the necessary contents to plan and execute structured and supported debriefing in the teaching and learning process of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a simulated environment. Methods: Integrative review, carried out in May 2021, in the National Library of Medicine, Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences, Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and Web of Science sources, with the assistance of Rayyan for selection of articles and adoption of the Content Analysis framework. Results: 469 studies were identified and four composed the final sample. Two categories were created: criteria for planning and executing the structured and supported debriefing method, characterized by objectives relevant to each phase of the debriefing; the actions that make it possible to achieve the goals; issues that trigger debriefing and execution time, and factors that interfere with the quality of structured and supported debriefing, mainly the aggressive approach to students and the emphasis on mistakes made. Final considerations: The structured and supported debriefing criteria must be adopted to support the quality of its planning and execution in the light of the teaching and learning process of simulating cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
References
ANDERSON M, et al. Simulation in Advanced Practice Education: Let’s Dialogue. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2019; 26: 81-5.
BHANJI F, et al. Part 14: Education: 2015. American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2015; 132(18Suppl2): S561-73.
BOWE S, et al. Facilitation and Debriefing in Simulation Education. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America 2017; 50(5): 989-1001.
CAMANHO GL. Nível de evidência. Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia. 2009; 44(6): 1-2.
COPPENS I, et al. The effectiveness of crisis resource management and team debriefing in resuscitation education of nursing students: A randomised controlled trial. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2018; 27(1-2): 77-85.
COSTA RR, et al. Perceptions of nursing students on the structural dimensions of clinical simulation. Sci Med. 2019; 29(1): e32972.
COUPER K, et al. An evaluation of three methods of in-hospital cardiac arrest educational debriefing: The cardiopulmonary resuscitation debriefing study. Resuscitation. 2016; 105: 130-7.
DÍAZ-NARVÁEZ VP, CALZADILLA-NÚÑEZ A. Artículos científicos, tipos de investigación y productividad científica en las ciencias de la salud. Revista Ciencias de la Salud. 2016; 14(1): 115-21.
FERNANDES MT, ALVES CN. Simulação como metodologia na formação de discentes em enfermagem no estágio final da graduação. Atas de Ciências da Saúde. 2019; 7: 115-25.
GALVÃO CM. Níveis de Evidência. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem. 2006; 19(2): V.
GANONG LH. Integrative reviews of nursing research. Research in Nursing & Health. 1987; 10(1): 1-11.
GRANT VJ, et al. Difficult debriefing situations: A toolbox for simulation educators. Medical Teacher. 2018; 40(7): 703–712.
HALAMEK, LP, et al. Using briefing, simulation and debriefing to improve human and system performance. Seminars in Perinatology. 2019; 43(8): 151178.
HALL K, TORI K. Best practice recommendations for debriefing in simulation-based education for australian undergraduate nursing students: an integrative review. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2017; 13(1): 39-50.
HUSEBØ SE, et al. Reflective practice and its role in simulation. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2015; 11(8): 368-375.
INTERNATIONAL NURSING ASSOCIATION FOR CLINICAL SIMULATION AND LEARNING (INACSL). INACSL Standards Committee. INACSL standards of best practice: SimulationSM simulation-enhanced interprofessional education (sim-IPE). Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2016; 12(S): S34-S38.
KIM JH, et al. Focused and Corrective Feedback Versus Structured and Supported Debriefing in a Simulation-Based Cardiac Arrest Team Training. Simulation in Healthcare. 2017; 12(3): 157-64.
KIM M, KIM S. Debriefing Practices in Simulation-Based Nursing Education in South Korea. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2017; 13: 201-9.
LEE J, et al. Debriefing methods and learning outcomes in simulation nursing education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Education Today. 2020; 104345.
MINAYO MC. Sampling and saturation in qualitative research: consensuses and controversies. Revista Pesquisa Qualitativa. 2017; 5(7): 1-12.
MOHER D, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. International Journal of Surgery Open. 2010; 8(5): 336-41.
OUZZANI M, et al. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews. 2016; 5(1): 210.
PALAGANAS JC, et al. Structured debriefing in simulation-based education. AACN Advanced Critical Care. 2016; 27(1): 78-85.
PHRAMPUS PE e O’DONNELL JM. Debriefing using a structured and supported approach. In: LEVINE AI, et al. The Comprehensive Textbook of Healthcare Simulation. New York: Springer Science; 2013. p. 74-7.
RIBEIRO LL, et al. O uso da metodologia ativa como ferramenta de fortalecimento para a segurança do paciente. Revista Eletrônica Acervo Enfermagem. 2021; 8: e4889.
SANTOS CM, et al. A estratégia PICO para a construção da pergunta de pesquisa e busca de evidência. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem. 2007; 15(3): 508-11.
TYERMAN J, et al. A systematic review of health care presimulation and briefing effectiveness. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2019; 27: 12-25.
URSI ES, GALVÃO CM. Prevenção de lesões de pele no perioperatório: revisão integrativa da literatura. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem. 2006; 14(1): 124-31.