Google Scholar | Citations: 958 | h-index: 12 i10-index: 19
Use of anticoagulants in the treatment of venous thrombosis: efficacy, safety, and clinical perspectives
PDF (Portuguese (Brazil))

Keywords

Anticoagulants
Deep vein thrombosis
Clinical trials
Therapeutic safety

How to Cite

Use of anticoagulants in the treatment of venous thrombosis: efficacy, safety, and clinical perspectives. (2026). Revista Eletrônica Acervo Médico, 26, e22501. https://doi.org/10.25248/reamed.e22501.2026

Copyright © | All rights reserved.

The journal holds the exclusive copyright for the publication of this article under the terms of Brazilian law 9610/98.

Partial reproduction
The use of parts of the texts, figures and questionnaire of the article is free, being mandatory the citation of the authors and journal.

Total reproduction
It is expressly prohibited and must be authorized by the journal.

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the efficacy and safety of anticoagulants in the treatment and prevention of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, based on clinical trials published in English and Portuguese. Methods: This is a narrative literature review that included randomized clinical trials available in scientific databases, addressing the use of different classes of anticoagulants, such as low molecular weight heparin, vitamin K antagonists, and direct oral anticoagulants, in patients diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. Results: The analyzed studies showed that direct oral anticoagulants, such as rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran, demonstrated similar efficacy to warfarin, with a lower incidence of major bleeding. Low molecular weight heparins and fondaparinux showed good results in the initial treatment phase, especially in postoperative patients. The use of clinical scores, such as HAS-BLED and Villalta, assisted in assessing bleeding risk and preventing post-thrombotic syndrome. Final considerations: Anticoagulants have demonstrated efficacy and safety in the management of venous thrombosis, with direct oral agents emerging as a promising alternative due to their practicality and lower hemorrhagic risk.

PDF (Portuguese (Brazil))

References

AGENO W, et al. Rivaroxaban treatment for six weeks versus three months in patients with symptomatic isolated distal deep vein thrombosis: randomised controlled trial. BMJ, 2022; 379: e072623.

ALCALAI R, et al. Apixaban vs. warfarin in patients with left ventricular thrombus: a prospective multicentre randomized clinical trial. European Heart Journal – Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy, 2021; 7(4): 349–356.

BIKDELI B, et al. Extended-duration low-intensity apixaban to prevent recurrence in patients with provoked venous thromboembolism and enduring risk factors: rationale and design of the HI-PRO trial. Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2022; 122(10): 1763–1772.

BISTERVELS IM, et al. Intermediate-dose versus low-dose low-molecular-weight heparin in pregnant and post-partum women with a history of venous thromboembolism (Highlow study): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. The Lancet, 2022; 400(10365): 1777–1787.

BOHULA EA, et al. Anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy for prevention of venous and arterial thrombotic events in critically ill patients with COVID-19: COVID-PACT. Circulation, 2022; 146(24): e061533.

COLLET JP, et al. Apixaban vs. standard of care after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the ATLANTIS trial. European Heart Journal, 2022; 43(30): 2783–2797. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac242.

CORREA LARA M, GARCÍA CHÁVEZ J. Rivaroxaban plus aspirin versus acenocoumarol to manage recurrent venous thromboembolic events despite systemic anticoagulation with rivaroxaban. Thrombosis Research, 2023; 223: 100–105.

COUTURAUD F, et al. Extended treatment of venous thromboembolism with reduced-dose versus full-dose direct oral anticoagulants in patients at high risk of recurrence: a non-inferiority, multicentre, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint trial. The Lancet, 2025; 405(10480): 725–735.

DELLUC A, et al. Statins for venous event reduction in patients with venous thromboembolism: a multicenter randomized controlled pilot trial assessing feasibility. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2021; 19(8): 2001–2009.

ENGELEN MM, et al. Venous thromboembolism in patients discharged after COVID-19 hospitalization. TH Open, 2021; 5(2): e230–e238.

GOSTEV AA, et al. Treatment of acute pulmonary embolism after catheter-directed thrombolysis with dabigatran vs warfarin: results of a multicenter randomized RE-SPIRE trial. Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders, 2024; 12(5): 101848.

KLINE JA, et al. Monotherapy anticoagulation to expedite home treatment of patients diagnosed with venous thromboembolism in the emergency department: a pragmatic effectiveness trial. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 2021; 14(7): e007600.

KOVACS MJ, et al. Postoperative low molecular weight heparin bridging treatment for patients at high risk of arterial thromboembolism (PERIOP2): double blind randomised controlled trial. BMJ, 2021; 373: n1205.

LEGNANI C, et al. Thrombophilia testing in the real-world clinical setting of thrombosis centres taking part in the Italian START 2-Register. Blood Transfusion, 2022; 20(1): 57–65.

MAHÉ I, et al. Extended anticoagulant treatment with full- or reduced-dose apixaban in patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: rationale and design of the API-CAT study. Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2021; 121(9): 1169–1180.

MERALI SJ, et al. Evaluation of safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of apixaban in pediatric subjects at risk of venous or arterial thrombotic disorder. CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology, 2023; 12(4): 500–512.

MOTTIER D, et al. Enoxaparin versus placebo to prevent symptomatic venous thromboembolism in hospitalized older adult medical patients. NEJM Evidence, 2022; 1(5): EVIDoa2200332.

NICOLAU AM, et al. Outcomes in older patients after switching to a newer anticoagulant or remaining on warfarin: the COMBINE-AF substudy. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2025; 85(5): 560–573.

RASKOB GE, et al. Benefit–risk assessment of rivaroxaban for extended thromboprophylaxis after hospitalization for medical illness. Journal of the American Heart Association, 2022; 11(23): e026229.

ROSA FD, et al. Isquemia arterial aguda de membros superiores em pacientes diagnosticados com COVID-19: série de casos. Jornal Vascular Brasileiro, 2021; 20: e202034.

ROSOVSKY RP, et al. A prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial evaluating anticoagulation alone vs anticoagulation plus computer-assisted vacuum thrombectomy for the treatment of intermediate-high-risk acute pulmonary embolism: rationale and design of the STORM-PE study. American Heart Journal, 2025; 272: 18–28.

SHALHOUB J, et al. Compression stockings in addition to low-molecular-weight heparin to prevent venous thromboembolism in surgical inpatients requiring pharmacoprophylaxis: the GAPS non-inferiority RCT. Health Technology Assessment, 2020; 24(69): 1–88.

SHANG J, et al. Low molecular weight heparin dosing regimens after total joint arthroplasty: a prospective, single-center, randomized, double-blind study. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 2024; 19(1): 5303.

SIMON MA, et al. Clinical outcome of deep vein thrombosis is related to thrombophilic risk factors. Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, 2023; 29: 10760296231152898.

SMITH SN, et al. Implementing pharmacist–prescriber collaboration to improve evidence-based anticoagulant use: a randomized trial. Implementation Science, 2023; 18(1): 73.

WIEGERS HMG, et al. Sex-specific differences in clot resolution 3 weeks after acute pulmonary embolism managed with anticoagulants: a substudy of the EINSTEIN-PE study. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2021; 19(5): 1288–1297.

WIK HS, et al. Post-thrombotic syndrome in patients with venous thromboembolism treated with dabigatran or warfarin: a long-term cross-sectional follow-up of RE-COVER study patients. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2021; 19(11): 2768–2778.

YAMASHITA Y, et al. Rivaroxaban for 18 months versus 6 months in patients with cancer and acute low-risk pulmonary embolism: an open-label, multicenter, randomized clinical trial (ONCO PE Trial). Circulation, 2025; 151(12): 1138–1149.