Google Acadêmico | Citações: 958 | índice h: 12 | índice i10: 19
Uso de anticoagulantes no tratamento da trombose venosa: eficácia, segurança e perspectivas clínicas
PDF

Palavras-chave

Anticoagulantes
Trombose venosa profunda
Ensaios clínicos
Segurança terapêutica

Como Citar

Uso de anticoagulantes no tratamento da trombose venosa: eficácia, segurança e perspectivas clínicas. (2026). Revista Eletrônica Acervo Médico, 26, e22501. https://doi.org/10.25248/reamed.e22501.2026

Copyright © | Todos os direitos reservados.

A revista detém os direitos autorais exclusivos de publicação deste artigo nos termos da lei 9610/98.

Reprodução parcial
É livre o uso de partes do texto, figuras e questionário do artigo, sendo obrigatória a citação dos autores e revista.

Reprodução total
É expressamente proibida, devendo ser autorizada pela revista.

Resumo

Objetivo: Analisar a eficácia e a segurança dos anticoagulantes no tratamento e prevenção da trombose venosa profunda e do tromboembolismo pulmonar, com base em ensaios clínicos publicados em inglês e português. Métodos: Trata-se de uma revisão integrativa da literatura que incluiu ensaios clínicos randomizados disponíveis em bases científicas, abordando o uso de diferentes classes de anticoagulantes, como heparina de baixo peso molecular, antagonistas da vitamina K e anticoagulantes orais diretos, em pacientes diagnosticados com trombose venosa profunda ou embolia pulmonar. Resultados: Os estudos analisados evidenciaram que os anticoagulantes orais diretos, como rivaroxabana, apixabana e dabigatrana, apresentaram eficácia semelhante à varfarina, com menor incidência de sangramentos maiores. As heparinas de baixo peso molecular e o fondaparinux mostraram bons resultados na fase inicial do tratamento, especialmente em pacientes pós-operatórios. O uso de escores clínicos, como HAS-BLED e Villalta, auxiliou na avaliação do risco de sangramento e na prevenção de síndrome pós-retrombótica. Considerações finais: Os anticoagulantes demonstraram eficácia e segurança no manejo da trombose venosa, sendo os agentes orais diretos uma alternativa promissora por sua praticidade e menor risco hemorrágico.

PDF

Referências

AGENO W, et al. Rivaroxaban treatment for six weeks versus three months in patients with symptomatic isolated distal deep vein thrombosis: randomised controlled trial. BMJ, 2022; 379: e072623.

ALCALAI R, et al. Apixaban vs. warfarin in patients with left ventricular thrombus: a prospective multicentre randomized clinical trial. European Heart Journal – Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy, 2021; 7(4): 349–356.

BIKDELI B, et al. Extended-duration low-intensity apixaban to prevent recurrence in patients with provoked venous thromboembolism and enduring risk factors: rationale and design of the HI-PRO trial. Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2022; 122(10): 1763–1772.

BISTERVELS IM, et al. Intermediate-dose versus low-dose low-molecular-weight heparin in pregnant and post-partum women with a history of venous thromboembolism (Highlow study): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. The Lancet, 2022; 400(10365): 1777–1787.

BOHULA EA, et al. Anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy for prevention of venous and arterial thrombotic events in critically ill patients with COVID-19: COVID-PACT. Circulation, 2022; 146(24): e061533.

COLLET JP, et al. Apixaban vs. standard of care after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the ATLANTIS trial. European Heart Journal, 2022; 43(30): 2783–2797. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac242.

CORREA LARA M, GARCÍA CHÁVEZ J. Rivaroxaban plus aspirin versus acenocoumarol to manage recurrent venous thromboembolic events despite systemic anticoagulation with rivaroxaban. Thrombosis Research, 2023; 223: 100–105.

COUTURAUD F, et al. Extended treatment of venous thromboembolism with reduced-dose versus full-dose direct oral anticoagulants in patients at high risk of recurrence: a non-inferiority, multicentre, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint trial. The Lancet, 2025; 405(10480): 725–735.

DELLUC A, et al. Statins for venous event reduction in patients with venous thromboembolism: a multicenter randomized controlled pilot trial assessing feasibility. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2021; 19(8): 2001–2009.

ENGELEN MM, et al. Venous thromboembolism in patients discharged after COVID-19 hospitalization. TH Open, 2021; 5(2): e230–e238.

GOSTEV AA, et al. Treatment of acute pulmonary embolism after catheter-directed thrombolysis with dabigatran vs warfarin: results of a multicenter randomized RE-SPIRE trial. Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders, 2024; 12(5): 101848.

KLINE JA, et al. Monotherapy anticoagulation to expedite home treatment of patients diagnosed with venous thromboembolism in the emergency department: a pragmatic effectiveness trial. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 2021; 14(7): e007600.

KOVACS MJ, et al. Postoperative low molecular weight heparin bridging treatment for patients at high risk of arterial thromboembolism (PERIOP2): double blind randomised controlled trial. BMJ, 2021; 373: n1205.

LEGNANI C, et al. Thrombophilia testing in the real-world clinical setting of thrombosis centres taking part in the Italian START 2-Register. Blood Transfusion, 2022; 20(1): 57–65.

MAHÉ I, et al. Extended anticoagulant treatment with full- or reduced-dose apixaban in patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: rationale and design of the API-CAT study. Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2021; 121(9): 1169–1180.

MERALI SJ, et al. Evaluation of safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of apixaban in pediatric subjects at risk of venous or arterial thrombotic disorder. CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology, 2023; 12(4): 500–512.

MOTTIER D, et al. Enoxaparin versus placebo to prevent symptomatic venous thromboembolism in hospitalized older adult medical patients. NEJM Evidence, 2022; 1(5): EVIDoa2200332.

NICOLAU AM, et al. Outcomes in older patients after switching to a newer anticoagulant or remaining on warfarin: the COMBINE-AF substudy. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2025; 85(5): 560–573.

RASKOB GE, et al. Benefit–risk assessment of rivaroxaban for extended thromboprophylaxis after hospitalization for medical illness. Journal of the American Heart Association, 2022; 11(23): e026229.

ROSA FD, et al. Isquemia arterial aguda de membros superiores em pacientes diagnosticados com COVID-19: série de casos. Jornal Vascular Brasileiro, 2021; 20: e202034.

ROSOVSKY RP, et al. A prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial evaluating anticoagulation alone vs anticoagulation plus computer-assisted vacuum thrombectomy for the treatment of intermediate-high-risk acute pulmonary embolism: rationale and design of the STORM-PE study. American Heart Journal, 2025; 272: 18–28.

SHALHOUB J, et al. Compression stockings in addition to low-molecular-weight heparin to prevent venous thromboembolism in surgical inpatients requiring pharmacoprophylaxis: the GAPS non-inferiority RCT. Health Technology Assessment, 2020; 24(69): 1–88.

SHANG J, et al. Low molecular weight heparin dosing regimens after total joint arthroplasty: a prospective, single-center, randomized, double-blind study. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 2024; 19(1): 5303.

SIMON MA, et al. Clinical outcome of deep vein thrombosis is related to thrombophilic risk factors. Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, 2023; 29: 10760296231152898.

SMITH SN, et al. Implementing pharmacist–prescriber collaboration to improve evidence-based anticoagulant use: a randomized trial. Implementation Science, 2023; 18(1): 73.

WIEGERS HMG, et al. Sex-specific differences in clot resolution 3 weeks after acute pulmonary embolism managed with anticoagulants: a substudy of the EINSTEIN-PE study. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2021; 19(5): 1288–1297.

WIK HS, et al. Post-thrombotic syndrome in patients with venous thromboembolism treated with dabigatran or warfarin: a long-term cross-sectional follow-up of RE-COVER study patients. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2021; 19(11): 2768–2778.

YAMASHITA Y, et al. Rivaroxaban for 18 months versus 6 months in patients with cancer and acute low-risk pulmonary embolism: an open-label, multicenter, randomized clinical trial (ONCO PE Trial). Circulation, 2025; 151(12): 1138–1149.