Resumo
Objetivo: Analisar as principais lesões neonatais causadas pelo uso dos diferentes tipos de fórceps em partos. Métodos: Foi realizada busca por trabalhos prévios nas plataformas PubMed e Portal Regional da BVS, um total de 28 artigos foram incluídos após aplicação de critérios de inclusão e exclusão. Resultados: Pelos estudos analisados, observou-se que fórceps, quando comparado a vácuo-extrator, apresenta menor risco de lesões neonatais de tecidos moles, cefalohematomas e icterícia. Contudo, lesões fetais faciais ocorrem mais quando há utilização de fórceps. Além disso, o fórceps Kielland se destaca como método mais eficaz e seguro dentre os demais instrumentos e o uso de fórceps Naegele também mostra grande sucesso. As complicações encontradas incluem: distocia de ombros, convulsões, baixo Apgar, hemorragia subgaleal, hemorragia intracraniana, lesão do nervo facial, hidrocefalia, lesão do plexo braquial, hemorragia vítrea, entre outras. Considerações finais: Há muitos estudos comparando uso de fórceps e de outros instrumentos de auxílio ao parto, no que diz respeito às lesões fetais, porém faltam estudos que tragam comparações entre os diversos tipos de fórceps, de forma a detalhar as lesões neonatais causadas com maior frequência por cada um deles.
Referências
AHLBERG M, et al. Risk factors for failed vacuum extraction and associated complications in term newborn infants: a population-based cohort study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016; 29(10): 1646–1651.
BAHL R, et al. Maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to the instrument used for mid-cavity rotational operative vaginal delivery: a prospective cohort study. BJOG. 2013; 120(12): 1526–1532.
CAUGHEY AB, et al. Forceps compared with vacuum: rates of neonatal and maternal morbidity. Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 106(5): 908-912.
CORCORAN S, et al. How safe is preterm operative vaginal delivery and which is the instrument of choice? J Perinat Med. 2013; 41(1): 57–60.
CUNHA AA. Indicações do parto a fórceps. Femina. 2011; 39(12).
DOLE C, et al. Intra pelvic spontaneous rotation of persistent occiput posterior position in case of operative vaginal delivery with spatulas. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021; 50(2): 101943.
FERRAZ A, et al. [Short-term neonatal outcomes of vacuum-assisted delivery. A case-control study]. An Pediatr (Engl Ed). 2019; 91(6): 378–385.
FREEMAN MD, et al. A multistate population-based analysis of linked maternal and neonatal discharge records to identify risk factors for neonatal brachial plexus injury. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017; 136(3): 331–336.
GARDELLA C, et al. The effect of sequential use of vacuum and forceps for assisted vaginal delivery on neonatal and maternal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 185(4): 896-902.
HINKSON L, et al. Intrapartum ultrasound during rotational forceps delivery: a novel tool for safety, quality control, and teaching. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 224(1): 93.e1–7.
JOHNSON JH, et al. Immediate maternal and neonatal effects of forceps and vacuum-assisted deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 103(3): 513-518.
KAWAKITA T, et al. Neonatal complications associated with use of fetal scalp electrode: a retrospective study. BJOG. 2016; 123(11): 1797–1803.
MATSUMOTO N, et al. Naegele forceps delivery and association between morbidity and the number of forceps traction applications: a retrospective study. J Pregnancy. 2015; 2015: 483195.
MCANENA L, et al. Forceps delivery-related ophthalmic injuries: a case series. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2015; 52(6): 355–359.
MILLER ES, et al. Association between obstetrician forceps volume and maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 123(2): 248-254.
MILLER ES, et al. Duration of operative vaginal delivery and adverse obstetric outcomes. Am J Perinatol. 2019; 37(05): 503–510.
MORÁVKOVÁ P, et al. Operative vaginal deliveries and their impact on maternal and neonatal outcomes - prospective analysis. Ceska Gynekol. 2019; 84(2): 93–98.
MURACA GM, et al. Maternal and neonatal trauma following operative vaginal delivery. CMAJ. 2022; 194(1): E1-E12.
MURGUÍA-GONZÁLEZ A, et al. [Risk factors of birth obstetric trauma]. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2013; 81(6): 297–303.
O’BRIEN S, et al. Rotational forceps versus manual rotation and direct forceps: A retrospective cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017; 212: 119–125.
REHM A, et al. Obstetric neonatal brachial plexus and facial nerve injuries: A 17 years single tertiary maternity hospital experience. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019; 243: 57–62.
SHEKHAR S, et al. A prospective randomized study comparing maternal and fetal effects of forceps delivery and vacuum extraction. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2013; 63(2): 116–119.
TEMPEST N, et al. A re-evaluation of the role of rotational forceps: retrospective comparison of maternal and perinatal outcomes following different methods of birth for malposition in the second stage of labour. BJOG. 2013; 120(10): 1277–1284.
TEMPEST N, et al. Neonatal and maternal outcomes of successful manual rotation to correct malposition of the fetal head; A retrospective and prospective observational study. PLoS One. 2017; 12(5): e0176861.
WALSH CA, et al. Mode of delivery at term and adverse neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 121(1): 122–128.
WAN L, et al. Effect of perineum protection cooperated by two operators in the forceps-assisted vaginal delivery: a case-control study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022; 35(1): 197–200.
WEN Q, et al. Temporal trends in severe maternal and neonatal trauma during childbirth: a population-based observational study. BMJ Open. 2018; 8(3): e020578.
YAMASATO K, et al. Complications of operative vaginal delivery and provider volume and experience. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021; 34(21): 3568–3573.
ZABEN M, et al. Subdural haematoma in neonates following forceps-assisted delivery: case series and review of the literature. Childs Nerv Syst. 2019; 35(3): 403-409.
ZHANG VR, et al. Operative vaginal delivery: practice patterns and outcomes at a tertiary general hospital. Singapore Med J. 2023; 64(5): 313-318.
