Quality of life in adults and elderly after hip arthroplasty
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the quality of life in adults and elderly, trauma victims, submitted to total and partial hip arthroplasty in a tertiary hospital. Methods: An analysis of the medical records was performed in relation to: sex, age, affected side and type of hip arthroplasty. Quality of life was assessed using the Short-Form Health Survey-36 (SF-36) questionnaire. Results: 103 patients underwent hip arthroplasty, of which 57 patients were included in the survey and 86% (n=49) underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA). Most patients were female (64.9%, n=37) and mean age was 73 years. The mental health, social aspects, general health status and vitality domains had the highest mean scores. On the other hand, the physical limitation, pain, functional capacity and emotional limitation domains were the dimensions considered most compromised. When comparing the groups submitted to THA and partial hip arthroplasty, a significant difference (p<0.05) was observed in the mental health and vitality domains. Conclusion: Most patients undergoing hip arthroplasty in a tertiary hospital are elderly, female and have a low quality of life after surgery.
Article Details
Copyright © | All rights reserved.
The journal holds the exclusive copyright for the publication of this article under the terms of Brazilian law 9610/98.
Partial reproduction
The use of parts of the texts, figures and questionnaire of the article is free, being mandatory the citation of the authors and journal.
Total reproduction
It is expressly prohibited and must be authorized by the journal.
References
2. URSO GO. Abordagem fisioterapêutica em diferentes tipos de artroplastia de quadril. Fisioter Br. 2010;11(1):49-53.
3. ABREU EL, OLIVEIRA MHA. Avaliação da qualidade de vida dos pacientes submetidos à hemiartroplastia do quadril. Rev Bras Ortop, 2015;50(5):530-6.
4. QUEIROZ RD, et al. Fraturas intracapsulares do colo femoral no idoso. Rev Bras Ortop, 2022;57(03):360-8.
5. REGOLIN F, et al. Artroplastia de quadril no SUS: oferta e utilização no estado do Rio de Janeiro. Rev Bai Saú Púb, 2019;43(3):502-22.
6. LIMA BLTS, et al. Estudo comparativo da funcionalidade do paciente submetido à artroplastia total de quadril. Rev Interd Ciênc Méd, 2017;1(1):96-109.
7. ONO NK, et al. Artroplastia parcial no tratamento das fraturas do colo do fêmur. Rev Bras Ortop, 2010;45(4):382-8.
8. PANCOTTE J, et al. Osteoartrite: prevalência e presença de fatores associados em idosos ativos. Rev Ciênc Méd Biol, 2017;16(1):40-4.
9. NOGUEIRA DL, et al. Papel causal do sexo nas artroplastias de quadril: quadril acometido, diagnóstico prévio e tempo de internação. Sau Pes, 2021;14(2):393-403.
10. GALIA CR, et al. Atualização em artroplastia total de quadril: uma técnica ainda em desenvolvimento. Rev Bras Ortop, 2017;52(5):521-7.
11. LOPES GD e SOUZA SR. Fatores que interferem na qualidade de vida após artroplastia total de quadril. Rev Rene, 2017; 18(2): 264-71.
12. MILENKOVIC S, et al. Total hip arthroplasty after acetabular fracture surgery. Int Orthop, 2021;45(4):871-6.
13. LAGUARDIA J, et al. Dados normativos brasileiros do questionário Short Form-36 versão 2. Rev Bras Epidemiol, 2013;16(4):889-7.
14. YETIŞ M, YURDAKUL E. The effects of capsular repair on quality of life after hip arthroplasty with the anterolateral approach. Blood Transf, 2021;3(1):4.
15. GOVEIA VR, et al. Perfil dos pacientes submetidos à artroplastia do quadril em hospital de ensino. Rev Col Bras Cirurg, 2015;42:106-10.
16. LOPES AD, et al. Medidas de avaliação de qualidade de vida e estados de saúde em ortopedia. Rev Bras Ortop, 2007;42(11/12):355-9.
17. WARE JE, SHERBOURNE CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care, 1992;30(6):473-83.
18. CHIKUDE T, et al. Avaliação da qualidade de vida dos pacientes idosos com fratura do colo do fêmur tratados cirurgicamente pela artroplastia parcial do quadril. Acta Ortop Bras, 2007;15:197-9.
19. SERFATY, A. Conceitos atuais relacionados à artroplastia do quadril e suas possíveis complicações. Radiol Bras, 2020;53:7.
20. ZAMPELI V, et al. A simple visual analog scale for pain is as responsive as the WOMAC, the SF-36, and the EQ-5D in measuring outcomes of revision hip arthroplasty: A prospective cohort study of 45 patients followed for 2 years. Acta Ortop, 2014;85(2):128-132.
21. SHI HY, et al. Responsiveness of the Harris Hip Score and the SF-36: five years after total hip arthroplasty. Qual Life Res, 2009; 18(8): 1053-60.
22. COLIBAZZI V, et al. Evidence based rehabilitation after hip arthroplasty. HIP Int, 2020, 30(2), 20-9.
23. MILANI JP, et al. A qualidade de vida no pré e pós-operatório de pacientes portadores de hérnia de disco lombar. J Bras Neurocir, 2009;20(3):345–51.
24. LOURES EA, LEITE ICG. Análise da qualidade de vida de pacientes osteoartrósicos submetidos à artroplastia total do quadril. Rev Bras Ortop, 2012;47(4):498-504.
25. YEO MGH, et al. Are Oxford hip score and Western Ontario and McMaster universities osteoarthritis index useful predictors of clinical meaningful improvement and satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty?. J Arthr, 2020;35(9):2458-64.
26. RAMPAZO-LACATIVA MK, et al. WOMAC and SF-36: instruments for evaluating the health-related quality of life of elderly people with total hip arthroplasty. A descriptive study. Med J, 2015;133(4):290-7.