Covid-19 em regiões de vulnerabilidade em Palmas, Tocantins: Relação entre fatores sociodemográficos, conhecimento e prevenção
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Publicado
Dec 10, 2022
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Resumo
Objetivo: Avaliar a relação entre fatores sociodemográficos com atitudes, prevenção e o conhecimento dos indivíduos sobre a Covid-19 em quatro regiões de vulnerabilidade social em Palmas, Tocantins. Métodos: Estudo transversal e descritivo com 351 voluntários, em 2020. Para análise, utilizou-se o programa Microsoft Excel associado a análise descritiva, seguido do teste qui-quadrado com nível de significância de 5%. Resultados: Dentre os entrevistados, 53,2% coabitavam ou eram considerados grupo de risco, 69,8% recebiam até um salário-mínimo, 79,77% possuíam conhecimento sobre o coronavírus e 90,31% conheciam estratégias de prevenção. Quanto ao isolamento social, 56,41% relataram isolamento parcial, 20,5% total e 22,5% nenhum. Houve associação significativa do isolamento social entre o grupo de risco (p=0,0251) e renda mensal (p=0,0016). Conclusão: Observou-se nível de conhecimento satisfatório em relação a Covid-19 e medidas de controle adotadas, políticas públicas em torno de pandemias são fundamentais para adoção de medidas preventivas estratégicas e eficazes.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Como Citar
MeloM. M., FerreiraY. C. F., ReisF. O. B. dos, LemosS. de S., SilvaN. J. R., LimaI. N. de, SeixaC. H. A. M., SantosJ. A. B. dos, SilvaW. G. da, & BaptistaA. B. (2022). Covid-19 em regiões de vulnerabilidade em Palmas, Tocantins: Relação entre fatores sociodemográficos, conhecimento e prevenção. Revista Eletrônica Acervo Saúde, 15(12), e11221. https://doi.org/10.25248/reas.e11221.2022
Seção
Artigos Originais
Copyright © | Todos os direitos reservados.
A revista detém os direitos autorais exclusivos de publicação deste artigo nos termos da lei 9610/98.
Reprodução parcial
É livre o uso de partes do texto, figuras e questionário do artigo, sendo obrigatória a citação dos autores e revista.
Reprodução total
É expressamente proibida, devendo ser autorizada pela revista.
Referências
1. AL-HANAWI MK, et al. Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Toward Covid-19 Among the Public in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Frontiers in Public Health, 2020; 8: 217.
2. ALTUNTAS M, et al. Evaluation of patients with Covid-19 diagnosis for chronic diseases. Virol J, 2021; 8(1): e.57.
3. ANWAR S, et al. Women's Knowledge, Attitude, and Perceptions Toward Covid-19 in Lower-Middle-Income Countries: A Representative Cross-Sectional Study in Bangladesh. Front Public Health, 2020; 8: 571689.
4. AQUINO EML, et al. Medidas de distanciamento social no controle da pandemia de Covid-19: potenciais impactos e desafios no Brasil. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 2020; 25(1): 2423–2446.
5. ATEHORTUA NA e PATINO S. Covid-19, a tale of two pandemics: novel coronavirus and fake news messaging. Health Promot Int, 2021; 36(2): 524–534.
6. BAPTISTA AB e FERNANDES LV. Covid-19, análise das estratégias de prevenção, cuidados e complicações sintomáticas. Desafios - Revista Interdisciplinar da Universidade Federal do Tocantins, 2020; 7(3): 38-47.
7. BATEMAN LB, et al. Confronting Covid-19 in under-resourced, African American neighborhoods: a qualitative study examining community member and stakeholders' perceptions. Ethn Health, 2021; 26(1):49-67.
8. BRASIL. 2020. In: Ministério da Economia. Os efeitos sobre grupos sociais e territórios vulnerabilizados das medidas de enfrentamento à crise sanitária da Covid-19: propostas para o aperfeiçoamento da ação pública. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/bitstream/11058/9839/1/NT_33_Diest_Os%20Efeitos%20Sobre%20Grupos%20Sociais%20e%20Territ%c3%b3rios%20Vulnerabilizados.pdf. Acessado em: 25 de out. de 2022.
9. CESTARI VRF, et al. Vulnerabilidade social e incidência de Covid-19 em uma metrópole brasileira. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 2021; 26(3): 1023-1033.
10. COSTA BCP, et al. Population adherence to the use of masks for the prevention and control of Covid-19: integrative literature review. Research, Society and Development, 2022; 11(4): e59311427831.
11. CHAN EYY, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of Hong Kong population towards human A/H7N9 influenza pandemic preparedness, China, 2014. BMC Saúde Pública, 2015; 15.943.
12. CHANG EYY, et al. Sociodemographic Predictors of Health Risk Perception, Attitude and Behavior Practices Associated with Health-Emergency Disaster Risk Management for Biological Hazards: The Case of Covid-19 Pandemic in Hong Kong, SAR China. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020; 17(11): e.3869.
13. CHEN J. Novel statistics predict the Covid‐19 pandemic could terminate in 2022. Journal of Medical Virology, 2022; 94(6): 2845–2848.
14. DEFAR A, et al. Knowledge, practice and associated factors towards the prevention of Covid-19 among high-risk groups: A cross-sectional study in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Plos one, 2021;16(3):e0248420.
15. ESTRELA FM, et al. Pandemia da Covid 19: refletindo as vulnerabilidades a luz do gênero, raça e classe. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 2020; 25(9): 3431–3436.
16. FARMER P. Social Inequalities and Emerging Infectious Diseases. Emerg Infect Dis., 1996;2(4):259–69.
17. FINTELMAN N, et al. Genetic Evidence and Host Immune Response in Persons Reinfected with SARS-CoV-2, Brazil. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 2021; 27(5): 1446–1453.
18. FREITAS CM, et al. Covid-19 as a Global Disaster: Challenges to risk governance and social vulnerability in Brazil. Ambiente & Sociedade, 2020; 25(3): 157-161.
19. FRIDMAN I, et al. Association Between Public Knowledge About Covid-19, Trust in Information Sources, and Adherence to Social Distancing: Cross-Sectional Survey. JMIR Public Health Surveill, 2020; 6(3): e22060.
20. GRAY DM, et al. Covid-19 and the other pandemic: populations made vulnerable by systemic inequity. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2020; 17(9): 520-522.
21. HAQ SU, et al. Knowledge, behavior and precautionary measures related to Covid-19 pandemic among the general public of Punjab province, Pakistan. J Infect Dev Ctries, 2020; 14(8): 823-835.
22. IBGE. 2010. In: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. População economicamente ativa. Rio de Janeiro. Disponível em: https://www.ibge.gov.br/apps/snig/v1/?loc=0&cat=-1,-2,-3,99,100,101,60,8,128&ind=4726. Acessado em: 30 de abril de 2021.
23. JANG WM, et al. Social Distancing and Transmission-reducing Practices during the 2019 Coronavirus Disease and 2015 Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Outbreaks in Korea. J Korean Med Sci, 2020; 35(23): e220.
24. KRICORIAN K, et al. Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy: misinformation and perceptions of vaccine safety. Hum Vaccin Immunother, 2022; 18(1): 1950504.
25. LAIRES PA, et al. The Association Between Chronic Disease and Serious Covid-19 Outcomes and Its Influence on Risk Perception: Survey Study and Database Analysis. JMIR Public Health Surveill, 2021; 7(1): e22794.
26. MACIEL E, et al. A campanha de vacinação contra o SARS-CoV-2 no Brasil e a invisibilidade das evidências científicas. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 2022; 27(3): 951–956.
27. MARQUITTI F, et al. Brazil in the face of new SARS-CoV-2 variants: emergencies and challenges in public health. Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, 2021; 24.
28. MS. 2021. In: Ministério da Saúde. Sobre a doença. Rio de Janeiro. Disponível em: https://coronavirus.saude.gov.br/sobre-a-doenca. Acessado em: 16 de abril de 2021.
29. ROMÃO GA e BRITO IS. Falhas das funções de governança na resposta à covid-19: o caso do isolamento social no Brasil. Multitemas, 2022; 27(66): 95–121.
30. SALLAM M, et al. Covid-19 misinformation: Mere harmless delusions or much more? A knowledge and attitude cross-sectional study among the general public residing in Jordan. PLoS One, 2020; 15(12): e0243264.
31. WAKE AD. Knowledge, Attitude, Practice, and Associated Factors Regarding the Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) Pandemic. Infection and Drug Resistance, 2020; 13: 3817-3832.
32. WHO. 2020. In: Advice for the public on Covid-19. Geneva. Disponivel em: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/advice-for-public. Acessado em: 10 de abr. de 2021.
33. WHO. 2020. In: Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: implications for infection prevention precautions: scientific brief. Disponivel em: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/333114. Acessado em: 16 de abril de 2021.
34. WHO. 2020. In: WHO Director-General's opening remarks at the media briefing on Covid-19. Disponivel em: https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-Covid-19---11-march-2020. Acessado em: 21 de abril de 2021.
35. YANG K, et al. Knowledge, attitude and practice of residents in the prevention and control of Covid-19: An online questionnaire survey. J Adv Nurs, 2021; 77(4): 1839-1855.
2. ALTUNTAS M, et al. Evaluation of patients with Covid-19 diagnosis for chronic diseases. Virol J, 2021; 8(1): e.57.
3. ANWAR S, et al. Women's Knowledge, Attitude, and Perceptions Toward Covid-19 in Lower-Middle-Income Countries: A Representative Cross-Sectional Study in Bangladesh. Front Public Health, 2020; 8: 571689.
4. AQUINO EML, et al. Medidas de distanciamento social no controle da pandemia de Covid-19: potenciais impactos e desafios no Brasil. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 2020; 25(1): 2423–2446.
5. ATEHORTUA NA e PATINO S. Covid-19, a tale of two pandemics: novel coronavirus and fake news messaging. Health Promot Int, 2021; 36(2): 524–534.
6. BAPTISTA AB e FERNANDES LV. Covid-19, análise das estratégias de prevenção, cuidados e complicações sintomáticas. Desafios - Revista Interdisciplinar da Universidade Federal do Tocantins, 2020; 7(3): 38-47.
7. BATEMAN LB, et al. Confronting Covid-19 in under-resourced, African American neighborhoods: a qualitative study examining community member and stakeholders' perceptions. Ethn Health, 2021; 26(1):49-67.
8. BRASIL. 2020. In: Ministério da Economia. Os efeitos sobre grupos sociais e territórios vulnerabilizados das medidas de enfrentamento à crise sanitária da Covid-19: propostas para o aperfeiçoamento da ação pública. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/bitstream/11058/9839/1/NT_33_Diest_Os%20Efeitos%20Sobre%20Grupos%20Sociais%20e%20Territ%c3%b3rios%20Vulnerabilizados.pdf. Acessado em: 25 de out. de 2022.
9. CESTARI VRF, et al. Vulnerabilidade social e incidência de Covid-19 em uma metrópole brasileira. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 2021; 26(3): 1023-1033.
10. COSTA BCP, et al. Population adherence to the use of masks for the prevention and control of Covid-19: integrative literature review. Research, Society and Development, 2022; 11(4): e59311427831.
11. CHAN EYY, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of Hong Kong population towards human A/H7N9 influenza pandemic preparedness, China, 2014. BMC Saúde Pública, 2015; 15.943.
12. CHANG EYY, et al. Sociodemographic Predictors of Health Risk Perception, Attitude and Behavior Practices Associated with Health-Emergency Disaster Risk Management for Biological Hazards: The Case of Covid-19 Pandemic in Hong Kong, SAR China. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020; 17(11): e.3869.
13. CHEN J. Novel statistics predict the Covid‐19 pandemic could terminate in 2022. Journal of Medical Virology, 2022; 94(6): 2845–2848.
14. DEFAR A, et al. Knowledge, practice and associated factors towards the prevention of Covid-19 among high-risk groups: A cross-sectional study in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Plos one, 2021;16(3):e0248420.
15. ESTRELA FM, et al. Pandemia da Covid 19: refletindo as vulnerabilidades a luz do gênero, raça e classe. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 2020; 25(9): 3431–3436.
16. FARMER P. Social Inequalities and Emerging Infectious Diseases. Emerg Infect Dis., 1996;2(4):259–69.
17. FINTELMAN N, et al. Genetic Evidence and Host Immune Response in Persons Reinfected with SARS-CoV-2, Brazil. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 2021; 27(5): 1446–1453.
18. FREITAS CM, et al. Covid-19 as a Global Disaster: Challenges to risk governance and social vulnerability in Brazil. Ambiente & Sociedade, 2020; 25(3): 157-161.
19. FRIDMAN I, et al. Association Between Public Knowledge About Covid-19, Trust in Information Sources, and Adherence to Social Distancing: Cross-Sectional Survey. JMIR Public Health Surveill, 2020; 6(3): e22060.
20. GRAY DM, et al. Covid-19 and the other pandemic: populations made vulnerable by systemic inequity. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2020; 17(9): 520-522.
21. HAQ SU, et al. Knowledge, behavior and precautionary measures related to Covid-19 pandemic among the general public of Punjab province, Pakistan. J Infect Dev Ctries, 2020; 14(8): 823-835.
22. IBGE. 2010. In: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. População economicamente ativa. Rio de Janeiro. Disponível em: https://www.ibge.gov.br/apps/snig/v1/?loc=0&cat=-1,-2,-3,99,100,101,60,8,128&ind=4726. Acessado em: 30 de abril de 2021.
23. JANG WM, et al. Social Distancing and Transmission-reducing Practices during the 2019 Coronavirus Disease and 2015 Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Outbreaks in Korea. J Korean Med Sci, 2020; 35(23): e220.
24. KRICORIAN K, et al. Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy: misinformation and perceptions of vaccine safety. Hum Vaccin Immunother, 2022; 18(1): 1950504.
25. LAIRES PA, et al. The Association Between Chronic Disease and Serious Covid-19 Outcomes and Its Influence on Risk Perception: Survey Study and Database Analysis. JMIR Public Health Surveill, 2021; 7(1): e22794.
26. MACIEL E, et al. A campanha de vacinação contra o SARS-CoV-2 no Brasil e a invisibilidade das evidências científicas. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 2022; 27(3): 951–956.
27. MARQUITTI F, et al. Brazil in the face of new SARS-CoV-2 variants: emergencies and challenges in public health. Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, 2021; 24.
28. MS. 2021. In: Ministério da Saúde. Sobre a doença. Rio de Janeiro. Disponível em: https://coronavirus.saude.gov.br/sobre-a-doenca. Acessado em: 16 de abril de 2021.
29. ROMÃO GA e BRITO IS. Falhas das funções de governança na resposta à covid-19: o caso do isolamento social no Brasil. Multitemas, 2022; 27(66): 95–121.
30. SALLAM M, et al. Covid-19 misinformation: Mere harmless delusions or much more? A knowledge and attitude cross-sectional study among the general public residing in Jordan. PLoS One, 2020; 15(12): e0243264.
31. WAKE AD. Knowledge, Attitude, Practice, and Associated Factors Regarding the Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) Pandemic. Infection and Drug Resistance, 2020; 13: 3817-3832.
32. WHO. 2020. In: Advice for the public on Covid-19. Geneva. Disponivel em: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/advice-for-public. Acessado em: 10 de abr. de 2021.
33. WHO. 2020. In: Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: implications for infection prevention precautions: scientific brief. Disponivel em: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/333114. Acessado em: 16 de abril de 2021.
34. WHO. 2020. In: WHO Director-General's opening remarks at the media briefing on Covid-19. Disponivel em: https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-Covid-19---11-march-2020. Acessado em: 21 de abril de 2021.
35. YANG K, et al. Knowledge, attitude and practice of residents in the prevention and control of Covid-19: An online questionnaire survey. J Adv Nurs, 2021; 77(4): 1839-1855.