Instrumentos de avaliação da atitude de enfermeiros frente à prevenção de lesão por pressão
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Publicado
Jul 19, 2023
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Resumo
Objetivo: Realizar um levantamento na literatura científica sobre quais instrumentos de avaliação da atitude de enfermeiros frente à prevenção de LP. Métodos: Revisão integrativa realizada nas bases de dados Lilacs, Medline, Scopus e Web of Science, utilizando a estratégia de busca em português: (“lesão por pressão” OR “úlcera por pressão” OR “úlcera de decúbito” OR “escara de decúbito”) AND enfermagem AND atitude AND prevenção, e, em inglês, (“pressure ulcer” OR “Bed Sore” OR “Bed Sores” OR Bedsore OR Bedsores) AND nursing AND atitude AND prevention, de acordo com as definições e palavra relacionadas presentes no DeCS e MESH. Resultados: Foram incluídos 14 artigos, sendo encontrados 3 instrumentos que verificam atitude de enfermeiros, Attitudes to Pressure Ulcers Prevention tool (APuP), Pressure Ulcer Attitude Test e Knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP). Considerações finais: Instrumentos que verificam a atitude de enfermeiros frente à prevenção de LP são necessários, não apenas para fins acadêmicos, mas para apoiar o trabalho de qualidade nas organizações de saúde na medida em que podem subsidiar programas de melhoria de competências e habilidades da força de trabalho.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Como Citar
CarreiroG. S. P., SoaresM. J. O. G., OliveiraS. H. S., & MendonçaA. E. O. (2023). Instrumentos de avaliação da atitude de enfermeiros frente à prevenção de lesão por pressão. Revista Eletrônica Acervo Saúde, 23(7), e12657. https://doi.org/10.25248/reas.e12657.2023
Seção
Revisão Bibliográfica
Copyright © | Todos os direitos reservados.
A revista detém os direitos autorais exclusivos de publicação deste artigo nos termos da lei 9610/98.
Reprodução parcial
É livre o uso de partes do texto, figuras e questionário do artigo, sendo obrigatória a citação dos autores e revista.
Reprodução total
É expressamente proibida, devendo ser autorizada pela revista.
Referências
1. BRASIL. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Incidentes relacionados à assistência à saúde. Resultados das notificações realizadas no Notivisa - Brasil, 2014 a 2021. 2022. Disponível em: https://www.gov.br/anvisa/pt-br/centraisdeconteudo/publicacoes/servicosdesaude/relatorios-de-notificacao-dos-estados/eventos-adversos/relatorios-atuais-de-eventos-adversos-dos-estados/brasil. Acessado em: 3 de fevereiro de 2023.
2. AJZEN, I. Attitudes, personality and behavior. 2nd ed. New York: Open University Press, 2005; 191p.
3. AKHKAND SS, et al. Examination of the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the attitude towards pressure ulcer prevention instrument in nurses. Journal of tissue viability, 2021; 30: 116–120.
4. AMBIEL RAM, CARVALHO LF. Definições e papel das evidências de validade baseadas na estrutura interna em Psicologia. In: Damásio BF e Borsa JC. Manual de desenvolvimento de instrumento psicológicos. 1st ed. São Paulo: Vetor, 2017; 439p.
5. AYDOGAN S, CALISKAN NA. Descriptive study of Turkish intensive care nurses' pressure ulcer prevention knowledge, attitudes, and perceived barriers to care. Wound management and prevention jornal, 2019; 65: 39-47.
6. BEECKMAN D, et al (2010). Pressure ulcers: development and psychometric evaluation of the attitude towards pressure ulcer prevention instrument (APuP). International journal of nursing studies, 2010; 47: 1432–1441.
7. CHARALAMBOUS C, et al. Knowledge and attitudes of nurses in a major public hospital in Cyprus towards pressure ulcer prevention. Journal Tissue Viability, 2019; 28: 40-5.
8. CLARKSON P, et al. An interprofessional approach to pressure ulcer prevention: a knowledge and attitudes evaluation. Journal Multidisciplinar Health, 2019; 12:377-386.
9. DLUNGWANE, TP. 2020. Nurses’ Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Regarding Pressure Ulcer Prevention in the Umgungundlovu District, South Africa. Africa Journal of Nursing and Midwifery, 2020; 22:17-34
10. ETAFA W, et al. Nurses' attitude and perceived barriers to pressure ulcer prevention. BMC nur, 2018; 17.
11. FERREIRA BEM, et al. Adesão dos profissionais de enfermagem as metas de segurança da OMS: uma revisão de literatura. Revista Eletrônica Acervo Enfermagem, 2021; 8: e5967.
12. FLORIN J, et al. Attitudes towards pressure ulcer prevention: a psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version of the APuP instrument. International Wound Journal, 2016; 13: 655-62.
13. HERNÁNDEZ RG, et al. Conocimiento, actitud y barreras en enfermeras hacia las medidas de prevención de úlceras por presión. Ciencia enfermeria, 2017; 23: 47-58.
14. GHAZANFARI MJ, et al. Knowledge, attitude, and practice of Iranian critical care nurses related to prevention of pressure ulcers: A multicenter cross-sectional study. Journal of tissue viability, 2022; 31: 326–331.
15. HALÁSZ GB, et al. Nurses' Knowledge and Attitudes towards Prevention of Pressure Ulcers. International Journal Environment Research Public Health, 2021; 18: 1705.
16. ISLAM S. Nurses’ Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices regarding Pressure Ulcer Prevention for Hospitalised Patients at Rajshashi Medical College in Bangladesh. (Master’s dissertation) - Prince of Songkla University, Tailândia, 2010.
17. JIANG L, et al. Nurses’ knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours related to pressure injury prevention: A large-scale cross-sectional survey in mainland China. Journal Clinical Nursing, 2020; 29: 3311– 3324.
18. KHOJASTEHFAR S, et al. Factors related to knowledge, attitude, and practice of nurses in intensive care unit in the area of pressure ulcer prevention: A multicenter study. Journal Tissue Viability, 2020; 29: 76-81.
19. LÓPEZ-FRANCO MD, et al. Attitudes of Spanish Nurses towards Pressure Injury Prevention and Psychometric Characteristics of the Spanish Version of the APuP Instrument. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17: 8543.
20. LOTFI M, et al. Iranian nurses' knowledge, attitude and behaviour on skin care, prevention and management of pressure injury: A descriptive cross-sectional study. Nursing Open, 2019; 6: 1600– 1605.
21. MOORE Z E PRICE P. (2004). Nurses' attitudes, behaviours and perceived barriers towards pressure ulcer prevention. Journal of clinical nursing, 2004; 13: 942–951.
22. NATIONAL PRESSURE INJURY ADVISORY PANEL – NPIAP. Pressure Injury Prevention Points. 2020. Disponível em: https://npiap.com/page/PreventionPoints. Acessado em: 20 abril de 2020
23. NATIONAL PRESSURE INJURY ADVISORY PANEL - NPIAP. Terminology from pressure ulcer to pressure injury and updates the stages of pressure injury. 2016. Disponível em: http://www.sobest.org.br/textod/35. Acessado em: 20 abril de 2020.
24. NATIONAL PRESSURE INJURY ADVISORY PANEL - NPIAP. Prevention And Treatament Of Pressure/Injury Ulcer: Clinical Practice Guideline. 2019. Disponível em: https://cdn.ymaws.com/npiap.com/resource/resmgr/online_store/posters/npiap_pip_tips_-_proning_202.pdf. Acessado em: 20 abril de 2022.
25. PACICO JC, et al. Validade. In: HUTZ CS, et al. Psicometria. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2015. p71-84
26. PAGE MJ, et al. A declaração PRISMA 2020: uma diretriz atualizada para relatar revisões sistemáticas. Epidemiologia e serviços de saúde, 2021; 31: e2022107.
27. PASQUALI L. Validade dos Testes. Examen: Política, Gestão E Avaliação Da Educação, 2017; 1: 36.
28. ROSTAMVAND M, et al. Nurses' attitude on pressure injury prevention: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on the pressure ulcer prevention instrument (APuP). Journal of tissue viability, 2022; 31: 346–352.
29. SANTOS CC, et al. Educação em serviço para a prevenção de lesão por pressão através do planejamento estratégico situacional. REVISA, 2020; 9: 773-83.
30. SOUSA LMM, et al. A metodologia da revisão integrativa da literatura em enfermagem. Revista Iberoamericana de Educacion e Investigacion em Enfermeria, 2017; 17-26.
31. SOUZA MC, et al. Organizational culture: prevention, treatment, and risk management of pressure injury. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 2020; 73: e20180510.
32. TAYEBI MZ, et al. (2020). Relationship Between Practice and Attitude Regarding Pressure Injury Among Intensive Care Nurses in Iran: A Descriptive, Correlational Study. Wound management & prevention, 2020; 66: 27–34.
33. TAYLOR C, et al. Barriers and enablers to the implementation of evidence-based practice in pressure ulcer prevention and management in an integrated community care setting: A qualitative study informed by the theoretical domains framework. Health & social care in the community, 2021; 29: 1365-2524.
34. TIRGARI B, et al. Pressure injury prevention: knowledge and attitudes of iranian intensive care nurses. Advanced Skin Wound Care, 2018; 31: 1-8.
35. ZANON C e HAUCK FILHO N. Fidedignidade. In: HUTZ CS, et al. Psicometria. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2015; 85-96.
2. AJZEN, I. Attitudes, personality and behavior. 2nd ed. New York: Open University Press, 2005; 191p.
3. AKHKAND SS, et al. Examination of the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the attitude towards pressure ulcer prevention instrument in nurses. Journal of tissue viability, 2021; 30: 116–120.
4. AMBIEL RAM, CARVALHO LF. Definições e papel das evidências de validade baseadas na estrutura interna em Psicologia. In: Damásio BF e Borsa JC. Manual de desenvolvimento de instrumento psicológicos. 1st ed. São Paulo: Vetor, 2017; 439p.
5. AYDOGAN S, CALISKAN NA. Descriptive study of Turkish intensive care nurses' pressure ulcer prevention knowledge, attitudes, and perceived barriers to care. Wound management and prevention jornal, 2019; 65: 39-47.
6. BEECKMAN D, et al (2010). Pressure ulcers: development and psychometric evaluation of the attitude towards pressure ulcer prevention instrument (APuP). International journal of nursing studies, 2010; 47: 1432–1441.
7. CHARALAMBOUS C, et al. Knowledge and attitudes of nurses in a major public hospital in Cyprus towards pressure ulcer prevention. Journal Tissue Viability, 2019; 28: 40-5.
8. CLARKSON P, et al. An interprofessional approach to pressure ulcer prevention: a knowledge and attitudes evaluation. Journal Multidisciplinar Health, 2019; 12:377-386.
9. DLUNGWANE, TP. 2020. Nurses’ Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Regarding Pressure Ulcer Prevention in the Umgungundlovu District, South Africa. Africa Journal of Nursing and Midwifery, 2020; 22:17-34
10. ETAFA W, et al. Nurses' attitude and perceived barriers to pressure ulcer prevention. BMC nur, 2018; 17.
11. FERREIRA BEM, et al. Adesão dos profissionais de enfermagem as metas de segurança da OMS: uma revisão de literatura. Revista Eletrônica Acervo Enfermagem, 2021; 8: e5967.
12. FLORIN J, et al. Attitudes towards pressure ulcer prevention: a psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version of the APuP instrument. International Wound Journal, 2016; 13: 655-62.
13. HERNÁNDEZ RG, et al. Conocimiento, actitud y barreras en enfermeras hacia las medidas de prevención de úlceras por presión. Ciencia enfermeria, 2017; 23: 47-58.
14. GHAZANFARI MJ, et al. Knowledge, attitude, and practice of Iranian critical care nurses related to prevention of pressure ulcers: A multicenter cross-sectional study. Journal of tissue viability, 2022; 31: 326–331.
15. HALÁSZ GB, et al. Nurses' Knowledge and Attitudes towards Prevention of Pressure Ulcers. International Journal Environment Research Public Health, 2021; 18: 1705.
16. ISLAM S. Nurses’ Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices regarding Pressure Ulcer Prevention for Hospitalised Patients at Rajshashi Medical College in Bangladesh. (Master’s dissertation) - Prince of Songkla University, Tailândia, 2010.
17. JIANG L, et al. Nurses’ knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours related to pressure injury prevention: A large-scale cross-sectional survey in mainland China. Journal Clinical Nursing, 2020; 29: 3311– 3324.
18. KHOJASTEHFAR S, et al. Factors related to knowledge, attitude, and practice of nurses in intensive care unit in the area of pressure ulcer prevention: A multicenter study. Journal Tissue Viability, 2020; 29: 76-81.
19. LÓPEZ-FRANCO MD, et al. Attitudes of Spanish Nurses towards Pressure Injury Prevention and Psychometric Characteristics of the Spanish Version of the APuP Instrument. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17: 8543.
20. LOTFI M, et al. Iranian nurses' knowledge, attitude and behaviour on skin care, prevention and management of pressure injury: A descriptive cross-sectional study. Nursing Open, 2019; 6: 1600– 1605.
21. MOORE Z E PRICE P. (2004). Nurses' attitudes, behaviours and perceived barriers towards pressure ulcer prevention. Journal of clinical nursing, 2004; 13: 942–951.
22. NATIONAL PRESSURE INJURY ADVISORY PANEL – NPIAP. Pressure Injury Prevention Points. 2020. Disponível em: https://npiap.com/page/PreventionPoints. Acessado em: 20 abril de 2020
23. NATIONAL PRESSURE INJURY ADVISORY PANEL - NPIAP. Terminology from pressure ulcer to pressure injury and updates the stages of pressure injury. 2016. Disponível em: http://www.sobest.org.br/textod/35. Acessado em: 20 abril de 2020.
24. NATIONAL PRESSURE INJURY ADVISORY PANEL - NPIAP. Prevention And Treatament Of Pressure/Injury Ulcer: Clinical Practice Guideline. 2019. Disponível em: https://cdn.ymaws.com/npiap.com/resource/resmgr/online_store/posters/npiap_pip_tips_-_proning_202.pdf. Acessado em: 20 abril de 2022.
25. PACICO JC, et al. Validade. In: HUTZ CS, et al. Psicometria. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2015. p71-84
26. PAGE MJ, et al. A declaração PRISMA 2020: uma diretriz atualizada para relatar revisões sistemáticas. Epidemiologia e serviços de saúde, 2021; 31: e2022107.
27. PASQUALI L. Validade dos Testes. Examen: Política, Gestão E Avaliação Da Educação, 2017; 1: 36.
28. ROSTAMVAND M, et al. Nurses' attitude on pressure injury prevention: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on the pressure ulcer prevention instrument (APuP). Journal of tissue viability, 2022; 31: 346–352.
29. SANTOS CC, et al. Educação em serviço para a prevenção de lesão por pressão através do planejamento estratégico situacional. REVISA, 2020; 9: 773-83.
30. SOUSA LMM, et al. A metodologia da revisão integrativa da literatura em enfermagem. Revista Iberoamericana de Educacion e Investigacion em Enfermeria, 2017; 17-26.
31. SOUZA MC, et al. Organizational culture: prevention, treatment, and risk management of pressure injury. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 2020; 73: e20180510.
32. TAYEBI MZ, et al. (2020). Relationship Between Practice and Attitude Regarding Pressure Injury Among Intensive Care Nurses in Iran: A Descriptive, Correlational Study. Wound management & prevention, 2020; 66: 27–34.
33. TAYLOR C, et al. Barriers and enablers to the implementation of evidence-based practice in pressure ulcer prevention and management in an integrated community care setting: A qualitative study informed by the theoretical domains framework. Health & social care in the community, 2021; 29: 1365-2524.
34. TIRGARI B, et al. Pressure injury prevention: knowledge and attitudes of iranian intensive care nurses. Advanced Skin Wound Care, 2018; 31: 1-8.
35. ZANON C e HAUCK FILHO N. Fidedignidade. In: HUTZ CS, et al. Psicometria. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2015; 85-96.