Análise da adesão dentinária após uso de lasers de alta potência em cimentação de pinos dentários estéticos
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Publicado
Jun 5, 2023
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Resumo
Objetivo: Investigar a adesão dentinária após uso de lasers de alta potência em cimentação de pinos dentários estéticos através de análise microscópica e teste de Push-out. Métodos: Para essa revisão integrativa foi realizada uma busca na base de dados PubMed em janeiro de 2023. Foram incluídos estudos publicados em qualquer idioma nos últimos cinco anos e foram excluídos artigos que não tivessem relacionados com a temática principal. Os seguintes dados foram extraídos: autores, ano de publicação, objetivo do estudo, tipo de laser, solução irrigadora, cimento utilizado, grau de exposição dos túbulos dentinários e resistência de união. Resultados: A busca principal resultou em 17 artigos, oito estudos foram publicados nos últimos cinco anos. Foram selecionados todos os estudos para essa revisão. O artigo mais antigo foi publicado em 2017 e o artigo mais recente em 2022. Todos foram estudos laboratoriais. Dentre os estudos selecionados foi observado que 62,5% utilizaram o laser Er:YAG. Seis estudos aplicaram o laser na dentina e 2 na superfície dos pinos de fibra. A melhor performance foi alcançada pelo laser Er:YAG. Considerações finais: Considera-se que o laser Er:YAG é o mais utilizado e apresenta melhores resultados para adesão entre o pino de fibra e a superfície dental.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Como Citar
LeiteC. C., AnjosL. M. dos, HeidenG. I., SimõesM. S. da S., ZattF. P., RigoD. C. A., CardosoM., & RochaA. de O. (2023). Análise da adesão dentinária após uso de lasers de alta potência em cimentação de pinos dentários estéticos. Revista Eletrônica Acervo Saúde, 23(6), e12808. https://doi.org/10.25248/reas.e12808.2023
Seção
Revisão Bibliográfica
Copyright © | Todos os direitos reservados.
A revista detém os direitos autorais exclusivos de publicação deste artigo nos termos da lei 9610/98.
Reprodução parcial
É livre o uso de partes do texto, figuras e questionário do artigo, sendo obrigatória a citação dos autores e revista.
Reprodução total
É expressamente proibida, devendo ser autorizada pela revista.
Referências
1. AKIN H, et al. Effect of Er:YAG laser application on the shear bond strength and microleakage between resin cements and Y-TZP ceramics. Lasers in Medical Science, 2012; 27(2): 333–338.
2. AKYUZ ESN, ERDEMIR A. Effect of different irrigant activation protocols on push-out bond strength. Lasers in Medical Science, 2015; 30(8): 2143–2149.
3. ALONAIZAN FA, et al. Effect of Photodynamic Therapy, Er,Cr:YSGG, and Nd:YAG Laser on the Push-Out Bond Strength of Fiber Post to Root Dentin. Photobiomodulation, Photomedicine, and Laser Surgery, 2020; 38(1): 24–29.
4. ANUSAVICE KJ. Philop’s Science of Dental Materials. 11 ed. St. Louis: Sauders Company; 2003.
5. ARI H, et al. Evaluation of the effect of endodontic irrigation solutions on the microhardness and the roughness of root canal dentin. Journal of endodontics, 2004; 30(11): 792–795.
6. DE AZEVEDO CT, et al. Mínima intervenção (MI) no tratamento da cárie profunda em dentística. Revista Eletrônica Acervo Saúde, 2021; 13(2): e5865.
7. ARSLAN H, et al. Efficacy of different treatments of root canal walls on the pull-out bond strength of the fiber posts. Lasers in Medical Science, 2015; 30(2): 863–868.
8. BERTRAND MF, et al. Er:YAG laser cavity preparation and composite resin bonding with a single-component adhesive system: Relationship between shear bond strength and microleakage. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, 2006; 38(6): 615–623.
9. BORDEA IR, et al. Evaluation of the outcome of various laser therapy applications in root canal disinfection: A systematic review. Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy, 2020; 29: 101611.
10. ERKUT S, et al. Microleakage in overflared root canals restored with different fiber reinforced dowels. Operative Dentistry, 2008; 33(1): 96–105.
11. DA COSTA FOA, et al. Retention of Provisional Intraradicular Retainers Using Fiberglass Pins. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent, 2020; 28;10(5):666-673.
12. DE AQUINO TS, et al. Laserterapia de baixa potência no tratamento de parestesia oral–uma revisão sistematizada. Revista Eletrônica Acervo Odontológico, 2020; 1: e3753.
13. DE MORAES MNCL, et al. Effect of using the New Glass Fiber Pin in Resin Composite Restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract, 2018; 19(5): 541-545.
14. DE OLIVEIRA ROCHA A, et al. Uso de pino de fibra de vidro para reabilitar unidade dental comprometida por extensa lesão cariosa: relato de caso. Revista Eletrônica Acervo Saúde, 2021; 13(6): e7847.
15. FRANKENBERGER R, et al. Fatigue behaviour of different dentin adhesives. Clinical oral investigations, 1999; 3(1): 11–17.
16. GALLO JR, et al. In vitro evaluation of the retention of composite fiber and stainless steel posts. Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists, 2002; 11(1): 25–29.
17. GEORGE R, et al. Laser Activation of Endodontic Irrigants with Improved Conical Laser Fiber Tips for Removing Smear Layer in the Apical Third of the Root Canal. Journal of Endodontics, 2008; 34(12): 1524–1527.
18. GORUS Z, et al. Laser application to the root surface increases the bonding strength of surface-treated prefabricated glass-fiber posts in teeth with excessive substance loss. Medical Science Monitor, 2018; 24: 100–104.
19. GUIDOTTI R, et al. Er:YAG 2,940-nm laser fiber in endodontic treatment: A help in removing smear layer. Lasers in Medical Science, 2014; 29(1): 69–75.
20. HAAPASALO M, et al. Irrigation in endodontics. Dental clinics of North America, 2010; 54(2): 291–312.
21. KASAKAWA A, et al. Effect of Q-switched Er:YAG laser irradiation on bonding performance to dentin surface. Dental materials journal, 2022; 41(4): 616–623.
22. KIRMALI Ö, et al. Push-out bond strength of various surface treatments on fiber post to root canal dentine using different irrigation techniques. Microscopy Research and Technique, 2021; 84(9): 2024–2033.
23. KÜÇÜK M, KERMEOĞLU F. Efficacy of different irrigation methods on dentinal tubule penetration of Chlorhexidine, QMix and Irritrol: A confocal laser scanning microscopy study. Australian Endodontic Journal, 2019; 45(2): 202–208.
24. LI ZZ, et al. Er:YAG laser ablation of enamel and dentin of human teeth: determination of ablation rates at various fluences and pulse repetition rates. Lasers In Surgery And Medicine, 1992; 12(6) 625–630.
25. MIGLIAU G. Classification review of dental adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the universal type. Annali di Stomatologia, 2017; 8(1): 1.
26. NAGAHASHI, T. et al. Er:YAG laser-induced cavitation can activate irrigation for the removal of intraradicular biofilm. Scientific Reports, 2022; 12(1): 4897.
27. NAGASE DY, et al. Influence of laser irradiation on fiber post retention. Lasers in Medical Science, 2011; 26(3): 377–380.
28. PAIVA SSM, et al. Molecular microbiological evaluation of passive ultrasonic activation as a supplementary disinfecting step: a clinical study. Journal of Endodontics, 2013; 39(2): 190–194.
29. PARLAR OZ, et al. Efeito do condicionamento a laser em pinos de fibra de vidro cimentados com diferentes sistemas adesivos. Fotomedicina e Cirurgia a Laser, 2018; 36(1): 51-57.
30. PELOZO LL, et al. Dentin pretreatment with Er:YAG laser and sodium ascorbate to improve the bond strength of glass fiber post. Lasers in Medical Science, 2019; 34(1): 47–54.
31. QUINTO J, et al. Evaluation of Intra Root Canal Er,Cr:YSGG Laser Irradiation on Prosthetic Post Adherence. Journal of Prosthodontics, 2019; 28(1): 181–185.
32. ROYDHOUSE RH. Punch-shear test for dental purposes. Journal of Dental Research, 1970; 49(1): 131–136.
33. SCHWENDICKE F, et al. When to intervene in the caries process? An expert Delphi consensus statement. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2019; 23(10): 3691–3703.
34. SOARES LES, et al. Combined FT-Raman and SEM studies of the effects of Er:YAG laser irradiation on dentin. Photomedicine and Laser Surgery, 2007; 25(4): 239–244.
35. TAKEDA FH, et al. Comparative study about the removal of smear layer by three types of laser devices. Journal of Clinical Laser Medicine and Surgery, 1998; 16(2): 117–122.
36. TAO L, et al. Effect of different types of smear layers on dentin and enamel shear bond strengths. Dental Materials, 1988; 4(4): 208–216.
37. TESHOME A, et al. Prevalence of Dental Caries and Associated Factos in East Africa, 2000-2020: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Public Health, 2021; 9: 645091.
38. VERMELHO P, et al. Influence of Er:YAG laser irradiation settings on dentin-adhesive interfacial ultramorphology and dentin bond strength. Microscopy Research and Technique, 2022; 85(8): 2943–2952.
39. WANG Q, et al. Effect of Er:YAG laser irrigation with different etching modes on the push-out bond strength of fiber posts to the root dentine. Lasers in Medical Science, 2022; 37(6): 2687–2696.
2. AKYUZ ESN, ERDEMIR A. Effect of different irrigant activation protocols on push-out bond strength. Lasers in Medical Science, 2015; 30(8): 2143–2149.
3. ALONAIZAN FA, et al. Effect of Photodynamic Therapy, Er,Cr:YSGG, and Nd:YAG Laser on the Push-Out Bond Strength of Fiber Post to Root Dentin. Photobiomodulation, Photomedicine, and Laser Surgery, 2020; 38(1): 24–29.
4. ANUSAVICE KJ. Philop’s Science of Dental Materials. 11 ed. St. Louis: Sauders Company; 2003.
5. ARI H, et al. Evaluation of the effect of endodontic irrigation solutions on the microhardness and the roughness of root canal dentin. Journal of endodontics, 2004; 30(11): 792–795.
6. DE AZEVEDO CT, et al. Mínima intervenção (MI) no tratamento da cárie profunda em dentística. Revista Eletrônica Acervo Saúde, 2021; 13(2): e5865.
7. ARSLAN H, et al. Efficacy of different treatments of root canal walls on the pull-out bond strength of the fiber posts. Lasers in Medical Science, 2015; 30(2): 863–868.
8. BERTRAND MF, et al. Er:YAG laser cavity preparation and composite resin bonding with a single-component adhesive system: Relationship between shear bond strength and microleakage. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, 2006; 38(6): 615–623.
9. BORDEA IR, et al. Evaluation of the outcome of various laser therapy applications in root canal disinfection: A systematic review. Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy, 2020; 29: 101611.
10. ERKUT S, et al. Microleakage in overflared root canals restored with different fiber reinforced dowels. Operative Dentistry, 2008; 33(1): 96–105.
11. DA COSTA FOA, et al. Retention of Provisional Intraradicular Retainers Using Fiberglass Pins. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent, 2020; 28;10(5):666-673.
12. DE AQUINO TS, et al. Laserterapia de baixa potência no tratamento de parestesia oral–uma revisão sistematizada. Revista Eletrônica Acervo Odontológico, 2020; 1: e3753.
13. DE MORAES MNCL, et al. Effect of using the New Glass Fiber Pin in Resin Composite Restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract, 2018; 19(5): 541-545.
14. DE OLIVEIRA ROCHA A, et al. Uso de pino de fibra de vidro para reabilitar unidade dental comprometida por extensa lesão cariosa: relato de caso. Revista Eletrônica Acervo Saúde, 2021; 13(6): e7847.
15. FRANKENBERGER R, et al. Fatigue behaviour of different dentin adhesives. Clinical oral investigations, 1999; 3(1): 11–17.
16. GALLO JR, et al. In vitro evaluation of the retention of composite fiber and stainless steel posts. Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists, 2002; 11(1): 25–29.
17. GEORGE R, et al. Laser Activation of Endodontic Irrigants with Improved Conical Laser Fiber Tips for Removing Smear Layer in the Apical Third of the Root Canal. Journal of Endodontics, 2008; 34(12): 1524–1527.
18. GORUS Z, et al. Laser application to the root surface increases the bonding strength of surface-treated prefabricated glass-fiber posts in teeth with excessive substance loss. Medical Science Monitor, 2018; 24: 100–104.
19. GUIDOTTI R, et al. Er:YAG 2,940-nm laser fiber in endodontic treatment: A help in removing smear layer. Lasers in Medical Science, 2014; 29(1): 69–75.
20. HAAPASALO M, et al. Irrigation in endodontics. Dental clinics of North America, 2010; 54(2): 291–312.
21. KASAKAWA A, et al. Effect of Q-switched Er:YAG laser irradiation on bonding performance to dentin surface. Dental materials journal, 2022; 41(4): 616–623.
22. KIRMALI Ö, et al. Push-out bond strength of various surface treatments on fiber post to root canal dentine using different irrigation techniques. Microscopy Research and Technique, 2021; 84(9): 2024–2033.
23. KÜÇÜK M, KERMEOĞLU F. Efficacy of different irrigation methods on dentinal tubule penetration of Chlorhexidine, QMix and Irritrol: A confocal laser scanning microscopy study. Australian Endodontic Journal, 2019; 45(2): 202–208.
24. LI ZZ, et al. Er:YAG laser ablation of enamel and dentin of human teeth: determination of ablation rates at various fluences and pulse repetition rates. Lasers In Surgery And Medicine, 1992; 12(6) 625–630.
25. MIGLIAU G. Classification review of dental adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the universal type. Annali di Stomatologia, 2017; 8(1): 1.
26. NAGAHASHI, T. et al. Er:YAG laser-induced cavitation can activate irrigation for the removal of intraradicular biofilm. Scientific Reports, 2022; 12(1): 4897.
27. NAGASE DY, et al. Influence of laser irradiation on fiber post retention. Lasers in Medical Science, 2011; 26(3): 377–380.
28. PAIVA SSM, et al. Molecular microbiological evaluation of passive ultrasonic activation as a supplementary disinfecting step: a clinical study. Journal of Endodontics, 2013; 39(2): 190–194.
29. PARLAR OZ, et al. Efeito do condicionamento a laser em pinos de fibra de vidro cimentados com diferentes sistemas adesivos. Fotomedicina e Cirurgia a Laser, 2018; 36(1): 51-57.
30. PELOZO LL, et al. Dentin pretreatment with Er:YAG laser and sodium ascorbate to improve the bond strength of glass fiber post. Lasers in Medical Science, 2019; 34(1): 47–54.
31. QUINTO J, et al. Evaluation of Intra Root Canal Er,Cr:YSGG Laser Irradiation on Prosthetic Post Adherence. Journal of Prosthodontics, 2019; 28(1): 181–185.
32. ROYDHOUSE RH. Punch-shear test for dental purposes. Journal of Dental Research, 1970; 49(1): 131–136.
33. SCHWENDICKE F, et al. When to intervene in the caries process? An expert Delphi consensus statement. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2019; 23(10): 3691–3703.
34. SOARES LES, et al. Combined FT-Raman and SEM studies of the effects of Er:YAG laser irradiation on dentin. Photomedicine and Laser Surgery, 2007; 25(4): 239–244.
35. TAKEDA FH, et al. Comparative study about the removal of smear layer by three types of laser devices. Journal of Clinical Laser Medicine and Surgery, 1998; 16(2): 117–122.
36. TAO L, et al. Effect of different types of smear layers on dentin and enamel shear bond strengths. Dental Materials, 1988; 4(4): 208–216.
37. TESHOME A, et al. Prevalence of Dental Caries and Associated Factos in East Africa, 2000-2020: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Public Health, 2021; 9: 645091.
38. VERMELHO P, et al. Influence of Er:YAG laser irradiation settings on dentin-adhesive interfacial ultramorphology and dentin bond strength. Microscopy Research and Technique, 2022; 85(8): 2943–2952.
39. WANG Q, et al. Effect of Er:YAG laser irrigation with different etching modes on the push-out bond strength of fiber posts to the root dentine. Lasers in Medical Science, 2022; 37(6): 2687–2696.