Desenvolvimento e validação de aplicativo para macroscopia do aparelho genital feminino
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Publicado
Sep 30, 2023
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Resumo
Objetivo: Apresentar o desenvolvimento e validação do aplicativo “AP Macroscopia” para aparelho genital feminino. Métodos: Estudo aplicado na modalidade de produção tecnológica. No desenvolvimento, optou-se pelo Design Instrucional Contextualizado. Foram utilizadas, nas questões de avaliação do aplicativo, a Escala de Likert e a técnica de Delphi. Para a validação do conteúdo adotou-se o Índice de Validade de Conteúdo com valor de concordância > 0,8 entre os juízes. Resultados: O aplicativo apresenta 54 telas e 55 imagens, informações gerais relacionadas ao setor de macroscopia e informações sobre 11 tipos de procedimentos macroscópicos do aparelho genital feminino. Foi validado por dez Médicos Patologistas, três Biólogos e um Biomédico. Houve consenso entre os avaliadores na primeira avaliação. O Índice de Validade do Conteúdo de todas as questões analisadas pelos juízes foi de 1,0. Deste modo, o resultado foi excelente, uma vez que 1,0 é o valor máximo de concordância. Conclusão: O AP Macroscopia foi validado por juízes com experiência na área, mostrando concordância entre os participantes da pesquisa na primeira avaliação. O app consiste em uma inovação tecnológica que contribui para melhoria dos exames macroscópicos e otimização do serviço de anatomia patológica, colaborando para o diagnóstico microscópico e tratamento do paciente.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Como Citar
PereiraF. S., MendonçaA. R. dos A., SaloméG. M., AraújoJ., AndradeM. C. A. de, OliveiraJ. V. de, MundimP., PereiraA. P., & MundimF. G. L. (2023). Desenvolvimento e validação de aplicativo para macroscopia do aparelho genital feminino. Revista Eletrônica Acervo Saúde, 23(9), e13164. https://doi.org/10.25248/reas.e13164.2023
Seção
Artigos Originais
Copyright © | Todos os direitos reservados.
A revista detém os direitos autorais exclusivos de publicação deste artigo nos termos da lei 9610/98.
Reprodução parcial
É livre o uso de partes do texto, figuras e questionário do artigo, sendo obrigatória a citação dos autores e revista.
Reprodução total
É expressamente proibida, devendo ser autorizada pela revista.
Referências
1. ALEXANDRE NMC e COLUCI MZO. Validade de conteúdo nos processos de construção e adaptação de instrumentos de medidas. Ciencia e Saude Coletiva, 2011; 16(7): 3061–3068.
2. ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NORMAS TÉCNICAS. ABNT ISO/TR 16982-2014. Ergonomia da interação humano-sistema - métodos de usabilidade que apoiam o projeto centrado no usuário, 2014.
3. BABAWALE M, et al. Verification and validation of digital pathology (whole slide imaging) for primary histopathological diagnosis: All wales experience. Journal of Pathology Informatics, 2021; 12(1): 4.
4. BARBOSA RCM e PINHEIRO AKB. Validação de um vídeo educativo para a promoção do apego seguro entre mãe soropositiva para o HIV e seu filho. Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing, 2008; 7(2): 1–156.
5. BARRA DCC, et al. Métodos para desenvolvimento de aplicativos móveis em saúde: Revisão integrativa da literatura. Texto e Contexto Enfermagem, 2017; 26(4): 1–12.
6. BARRETT D e HEALE R. What are Delphi studies? Evidence-Based Nursing, 2020; 23(3): 68–69.
7. BELL WC, et al. The efficient operation of the surgical pathology gross room. Biotechnic and Histochemistry, 2008; 83(2): 71–82.
8. BOGOEVSKI K, et al. Tissue Morphology and Antigenicity in Mouse and Rat Tibia: Comparing 12 Different Decalcification Conditions. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, 2019; 67(8): 545–561.
9. COLLEGE OF AMERICAN PATHOLOGISTS. In: Protocols and Guidelines. Cancer Protocol Templates – Gynecologic. 2023; 5.
10. COMPTON CC, et al. Preanalytics and precision pathology: Pathology practices to ensure molecular integrity of cancer patient biospecimens for precision medicine. Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 2019; 143(11): 1346–1363.
11. DE KORTE EM, et al. Evaluating an mHealth app for health and well-being at work: Mixed-method qualitative study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2018; 6(3): 1–17.
12. DONCZO B e GUTTMAN A. Biomedical analysis of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples: The Holy Grail for molecular diagnostics. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 2018; 155: 125-134.
13. GRANT JS e DAVIS LL. Selection and use of content experts for instrument development. Research in Nursing & Health, 1997; 20(3): 269–274.
14. HERNÁNDEZ‐NEUTA I, et al. Smartphone‐based clinical diagnostics: towards democratization of evidence‐based health care. Journal of Internal Medicine, 2019; 285(1): 19–39.
15. HORTENSE FTP, et al. Construction and validation of clinical contents for development of learning objects. Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2018; 71(2): 306–313.
16. HORTON S, et al. Delivering modern, high-quality, affordable pathology and laboratory medicine to low-income and middle-income countries: a call to action. The Lancet, 2018; 391(10133): 1953–1964.
17. JHUN I, et al. Implementation of collodion bag protocol to improve whole-slide imaging of scant gynecologic curettage specimens. Journal of Pathology Informatics, 2021; 12(1): 2.
18. JIANG J, et al. Digital pathology-based study of cell- and tissue-level morphologic features in serous borderline ovarian tumor and high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Journal of Pathology Informatics, 2021; 12(1): 24.
19. KOSOWICZ L, et al. Lessons for Vietnam on the Use of Digital Technologies to Support Patient-Centered Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries in the Asia-Pacific Region: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2023; 25: e43224.
20. KULAK O, et al. Smart Glasses as a Surgical Pathology Grossing Tool. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 2021; 145(4): 457–460.
21. LI X e ZHANG M. How digital health technologies promote healthy life in the Post-COVID-19 Era: evidences from national survey on Chinese adolescents and youngsters. Frontie in Public Health, 2023; 11:1135313.
22. LIMA ACMACC, et al. Development and validation of a booklet for prevention of vertical HIV transmission. ACTA Paulista de Enfermagem, 2017; 30(2): 181–189.
23. MALPICA A, et al. Endometrial Carcinoma, Grossing and Processing Issues: Recommendations of the International Society of Gynecologic Pathologists. International Journal of Gynecological Pathology, 2019; 38(1): S9–S24.
24. MCKAY FH, et al. Using Health and Well-Being Apps for Behavior Change: A Systematic Search and Rating of Apps. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019; 7(7): e11926.
25. PANTANOWITZ L, et al. Validating Whole Slide Imaging for Diagnostic Purposes in Pathology: Guideline from the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 2013; 137(12): 1710-1722.
26. PASQUALI L. Instrumentação psicológica: fundamentos e práticas. Artmed, 2010.
27. PEREIRA FS. Aplicativo: Macroscopia do Aparelho Genital Feminino. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Aplicadas a Saúde) – Universidade do Vale do Sapucaí – Univas, Pouso Alegre, 2020; 47 p.
28. RAMASWAMY V, et al. Remote reporting during a pandemic using digital pathology solution: Experience from a tertiary care cancer center. Journal of Pathology Informatics, 2021; 12(1): 20.
29. RAMPY BA e GLASSY EF. Pathology Gross Photography: The Beginning of Digital Pathology. Clinics in Laboratory Medicine, 2016; 36(1): 67–87.
30. ROBERTSON S. A novel web application for rapidly searching the diagnostic case archive. Journal of Pathology Informatics, 2020; 11(1): 39.
31. RODRIGUES LDN, et al. Construction and validation of an educational booklet on care for children with gastrostomy. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 2020; 73(3): e20190467.
32. SABINO LMM DE, et al. Elaboração e validação de cartilha para prevenção da diarreia infantil. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem, 2018; 31(3): 233–239.
33. SAMIMI G, et al. Processing of fallopian tube, ovary, and endometrial surgical pathology specimens: A survey of U.S. laboratory practices. Gynecologic Oncology, 2018; 148(3): 515–520.
34. SAVI FM, et al. Comparison of Different Decalcification Methods Using Rat Mandibles as a Model. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, 2017; 65(12): 705–722.
35. SAYED S, et al. Improving pathology and laboratory medicine in low-income and middle-income countries: roadmap to solutions. The Lancet, 2018; 391(10133): 1939–1952.
36. SIDDIQUE O, et al. The importance of a multidisciplinary approach to hepatocellular carcinoma. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 2017; 10: 95–100.
37. SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE PATOLOGIA. In: Manual de Padronização de Laudos Histopatológicos. São Paulo: SBP. 2019.
38. SUNG H, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2021; 71(3): 209–249.
39. VARMA M, et al. Macroscopy under the microscope: a critical reappraisal of grossing techniques. Histopathology, 2020; 76(7): 930–933.
40. WILSON ML, et al. Access to pathology and laboratory medicine services: a crucial gap. The Lancet, 2018; 391(10133): 1927–1938.
2. ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NORMAS TÉCNICAS. ABNT ISO/TR 16982-2014. Ergonomia da interação humano-sistema - métodos de usabilidade que apoiam o projeto centrado no usuário, 2014.
3. BABAWALE M, et al. Verification and validation of digital pathology (whole slide imaging) for primary histopathological diagnosis: All wales experience. Journal of Pathology Informatics, 2021; 12(1): 4.
4. BARBOSA RCM e PINHEIRO AKB. Validação de um vídeo educativo para a promoção do apego seguro entre mãe soropositiva para o HIV e seu filho. Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing, 2008; 7(2): 1–156.
5. BARRA DCC, et al. Métodos para desenvolvimento de aplicativos móveis em saúde: Revisão integrativa da literatura. Texto e Contexto Enfermagem, 2017; 26(4): 1–12.
6. BARRETT D e HEALE R. What are Delphi studies? Evidence-Based Nursing, 2020; 23(3): 68–69.
7. BELL WC, et al. The efficient operation of the surgical pathology gross room. Biotechnic and Histochemistry, 2008; 83(2): 71–82.
8. BOGOEVSKI K, et al. Tissue Morphology and Antigenicity in Mouse and Rat Tibia: Comparing 12 Different Decalcification Conditions. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, 2019; 67(8): 545–561.
9. COLLEGE OF AMERICAN PATHOLOGISTS. In: Protocols and Guidelines. Cancer Protocol Templates – Gynecologic. 2023; 5.
10. COMPTON CC, et al. Preanalytics and precision pathology: Pathology practices to ensure molecular integrity of cancer patient biospecimens for precision medicine. Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 2019; 143(11): 1346–1363.
11. DE KORTE EM, et al. Evaluating an mHealth app for health and well-being at work: Mixed-method qualitative study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2018; 6(3): 1–17.
12. DONCZO B e GUTTMAN A. Biomedical analysis of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples: The Holy Grail for molecular diagnostics. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 2018; 155: 125-134.
13. GRANT JS e DAVIS LL. Selection and use of content experts for instrument development. Research in Nursing & Health, 1997; 20(3): 269–274.
14. HERNÁNDEZ‐NEUTA I, et al. Smartphone‐based clinical diagnostics: towards democratization of evidence‐based health care. Journal of Internal Medicine, 2019; 285(1): 19–39.
15. HORTENSE FTP, et al. Construction and validation of clinical contents for development of learning objects. Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2018; 71(2): 306–313.
16. HORTON S, et al. Delivering modern, high-quality, affordable pathology and laboratory medicine to low-income and middle-income countries: a call to action. The Lancet, 2018; 391(10133): 1953–1964.
17. JHUN I, et al. Implementation of collodion bag protocol to improve whole-slide imaging of scant gynecologic curettage specimens. Journal of Pathology Informatics, 2021; 12(1): 2.
18. JIANG J, et al. Digital pathology-based study of cell- and tissue-level morphologic features in serous borderline ovarian tumor and high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Journal of Pathology Informatics, 2021; 12(1): 24.
19. KOSOWICZ L, et al. Lessons for Vietnam on the Use of Digital Technologies to Support Patient-Centered Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries in the Asia-Pacific Region: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2023; 25: e43224.
20. KULAK O, et al. Smart Glasses as a Surgical Pathology Grossing Tool. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 2021; 145(4): 457–460.
21. LI X e ZHANG M. How digital health technologies promote healthy life in the Post-COVID-19 Era: evidences from national survey on Chinese adolescents and youngsters. Frontie in Public Health, 2023; 11:1135313.
22. LIMA ACMACC, et al. Development and validation of a booklet for prevention of vertical HIV transmission. ACTA Paulista de Enfermagem, 2017; 30(2): 181–189.
23. MALPICA A, et al. Endometrial Carcinoma, Grossing and Processing Issues: Recommendations of the International Society of Gynecologic Pathologists. International Journal of Gynecological Pathology, 2019; 38(1): S9–S24.
24. MCKAY FH, et al. Using Health and Well-Being Apps for Behavior Change: A Systematic Search and Rating of Apps. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019; 7(7): e11926.
25. PANTANOWITZ L, et al. Validating Whole Slide Imaging for Diagnostic Purposes in Pathology: Guideline from the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 2013; 137(12): 1710-1722.
26. PASQUALI L. Instrumentação psicológica: fundamentos e práticas. Artmed, 2010.
27. PEREIRA FS. Aplicativo: Macroscopia do Aparelho Genital Feminino. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Aplicadas a Saúde) – Universidade do Vale do Sapucaí – Univas, Pouso Alegre, 2020; 47 p.
28. RAMASWAMY V, et al. Remote reporting during a pandemic using digital pathology solution: Experience from a tertiary care cancer center. Journal of Pathology Informatics, 2021; 12(1): 20.
29. RAMPY BA e GLASSY EF. Pathology Gross Photography: The Beginning of Digital Pathology. Clinics in Laboratory Medicine, 2016; 36(1): 67–87.
30. ROBERTSON S. A novel web application for rapidly searching the diagnostic case archive. Journal of Pathology Informatics, 2020; 11(1): 39.
31. RODRIGUES LDN, et al. Construction and validation of an educational booklet on care for children with gastrostomy. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 2020; 73(3): e20190467.
32. SABINO LMM DE, et al. Elaboração e validação de cartilha para prevenção da diarreia infantil. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem, 2018; 31(3): 233–239.
33. SAMIMI G, et al. Processing of fallopian tube, ovary, and endometrial surgical pathology specimens: A survey of U.S. laboratory practices. Gynecologic Oncology, 2018; 148(3): 515–520.
34. SAVI FM, et al. Comparison of Different Decalcification Methods Using Rat Mandibles as a Model. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, 2017; 65(12): 705–722.
35. SAYED S, et al. Improving pathology and laboratory medicine in low-income and middle-income countries: roadmap to solutions. The Lancet, 2018; 391(10133): 1939–1952.
36. SIDDIQUE O, et al. The importance of a multidisciplinary approach to hepatocellular carcinoma. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 2017; 10: 95–100.
37. SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE PATOLOGIA. In: Manual de Padronização de Laudos Histopatológicos. São Paulo: SBP. 2019.
38. SUNG H, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2021; 71(3): 209–249.
39. VARMA M, et al. Macroscopy under the microscope: a critical reappraisal of grossing techniques. Histopathology, 2020; 76(7): 930–933.
40. WILSON ML, et al. Access to pathology and laboratory medicine services: a crucial gap. The Lancet, 2018; 391(10133): 1927–1938.