Avaliação da qualidade de vida relacionada a pacientes usando prótese protocolo Branemark
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Resumo
Objetivo: O objetivo do estudo foi avaliar a qualidade de vida dos pacientes reabilitados com o protocolo de Branemark por meio de questionário adaptado a partir do Whoqol bref. Métodos: Este estudo transversal avaliou 11 indivíduos usuários de prótese do tipo protocolo de Branemark, de ambos os gêneros com idade entre 50 e 67 anos, após preencherem os critérios de inclusão e exclusão foi aplicado individualmente um questionário adaptado a partir do Whoqol-Bref, constituído por quatro domínios: psicológico, relações pessoais, meio ambiente e físico e os dados quantitativos qualitativos coletados foram analisados por estatística descritiva e porcentual. Resultados: Entre os 11 indivíduos todos eram residentes da cidade de Belém, maioria da população era composta pelo sexo feminino 8/11 (72.2%), com idade média de 57.2 anos, na escolaridade 5/11 (45.4%) possuia o ensino médio completo e no estado civil a maioria era casado ou divorciado, 5/11 (45.4%) respectivamente. O grau de satisfação dos pacientes foi considerado elevado, sendo 11/11 (100%). Analisando os domínios citados, o que obteve menor índice de satisfação foi o meio ambiente. Conclusão: O protocolo de Branemark teve impacto positivo na qualidade de vida dos pacientes avaliados, sendo essencial na manutenção de índices satisfatórios de vida.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Copyright © | Todos os direitos reservados.
A revista detém os direitos autorais exclusivos de publicação deste artigo nos termos da lei 9610/98.
Reprodução parcial
É livre o uso de partes do texto, figuras e questionário do artigo, sendo obrigatória a citação dos autores e revista.
Reprodução total
É expressamente proibida, devendo ser autorizada pela revista.
Referências
2. AMIN MF, et al. Assessment of quality of life and its determinants in type-2 diabetes patients using the WHOQOL-BREF instrument in Bangladesh. BMC Endocrine Disorders, 2022; 22: 162-166.
3. AZAMI-AGHDASH S, et al. Oral Health and Related Quality of Life in Older People: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 2021; 50: 689-700.
4. BĂJENARU L, et al. Latent profile analysis for quality of life in older patients. BMC Geriatrics, 2022; 22: 848-852.
5. BUSER D, et al. Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions. Periodontology 2000, 2017; 73: 7-21.
6. DE MEDEIROS MMD, et al. Does the institutionalization influence elderly's quality of life? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Geriatrics, 2020; 20: 44-50.
7. DIKICIER S, et al. Health-related quality of life in edentulous patients. Journal of Medicine and Life, 2021; 14: 683-689.
8. EL OSTA N, et al. Comparison of psychometric properties of GOHAI, OHIP-14, and OHIP-EDENT as measures of oral health in complete edentulous patients aged 60 years and more. Quality of Life Research, 2021; 30: 1199-1213.
9. EL OSTA N, et al. Comparison of the OHIP-14 and GOHAI as measures of oral health among elderly in Lebanon. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2012, 30: 131-138.
10. FONTEYNE E, et al. Four-implant-supported overdenture treatment in the maxilla. Part II: Speech- and oral health-related quality of life in patients with implant-supported overdentures in the maxilla-A prospective 3-year follow-up. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 2021; 23: 680-691.
11. GAU BS, et al. Clinical applicability of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF) to mothers of children with asthma in Taiwan. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2010; 19: 811-819.
12. GHOLAMI A, et al. Application of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument, Short Form (WHOQOL-BREF) to patients with cataract. Epidemiology and Health, 2016; 4: 2016005.
13. GONÇALVES GSY, et al. Oral health-related quality of life and satisfaction in edentulous patients rehabilitated with implant-supported full dentures all-on-four concept: a systematic review. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2022; 26: 83-94.
14. GÖTHBERG C, et al. Bone and soft tissue outcomes, risk factors, and complications of implant-supported prostheses: 5-Years RCT with different abutment types and loading protocols. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 2018; 20: 313-321.
15. HASSEL AJ, et al. Oral health-related quality of life of elderly Germans--comparison of GOHAI and OHIP-14. Community Dental Health Journal, 2010; 27: 242-247.
16. ILIĆ I, et al. Psychometric Properties of the World Health Organization's Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) Questionnaire in Medical Students. Medicina, 2019; 55: 772-784.
17. JEMT T, et al. Incidence of surgery related to problems with peri-implantitis: a retrospective study on patients followed up between 2003 and 2010 at one specialist clinic. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 2015, 17: 209-220.
18. JIKAMO B, et al. Cultural adaptation and validation of the Sidamic version of the World Health Organization Quality-of-Life-Bref Scale measuring the quality of life of women with severe preeclampsia in southern Ethiopia, 2020. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2021; 19: 239-245.
19. KIM HY, et al. Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the world health organization quality of life instrument-older adults module. Geriatric Nursing, 2021; 42: 548-554.
20. LOCKER D, et al. Comparison of the GOHAI and OHIP-14 as measures of the oral health-related quality of life of the elderly. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 2001; 29: 373-381.
21. MARTINS AMC, et al. The effect of complete dentures on edentulous patients' oral health-related quality of life in long-term: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dental Research Journal, 2021; 18: 65-71.
22. PASSIA N, et al. Influence of the number of implants in the edentulous mandible on chewing efficacy and oral health-related quality of life-A within-subject design study. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2022; 33: 1030-1037.
23. RIVA F, et al. Adult oral health-related quality of life instruments: A systematic review. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 2022; 50: 333-338.
24. SANTUCCI D, et al. Development of a Maltese version of oral health-associated questionnaires: OHIP-14, GOHAI, and the Denture Satisfaction Questionnaire. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 2014; 27: 44-49.
25. SARTORETTO SC, et al. Effectiveness of Supportive Care in the Prevention of Peri-implant Diseases in Brånemark Protocol Rehabilitations: A Retrospective Cohort Study. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 2022; 42: 217-223.
26. SHARKA R, et al. Oral health-related quality of life and satisfaction of edentulous patients using conventional complete dentures and implant-retained overdentures: An umbrella systematic review. Gerodontology, 2019; 36(3): 195-204.
27. SOUZA JÚNIOR EV, et al. Relationship between family functionality and the quality of life of the elderly. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem. 2021; 75: 20210106.
28. ZAHED M, et al. Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Chronic Liver Failure Patients Measured by OHIP-14 and GOHAI. BioMed Research International, 2020; 26: 8835824.