Tradução e adaptação transcultural de instrumento para mensurar autoridade e autonomia profissional de enfermeiros
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Resumo
Objetivo: Realizar a adaptação transcultural da Nursing Authority And Autonomy Scale para o contexto do Brasil. Métodos: Estudo metodológico de tradução e adaptação transcultural que seguiu cinco etapas: tradução, síntese, tradução reversa, avaliação por comitê de especialistas e pré-teste. O Índice de Validade de Conteúdo de ≥0,75 e Coeficiente Kappa de Cohen >0,61 foram considerados adequados para a pesquisa. Resultados: A tradução da Nursing Authority And Autonomy Scale foi consistente e aprovada por comitê de especialistas com IVC ≥0,80 e Kappa ≥0,76. O pré-teste contou com a participação de 60 enfermeiros, sendo 30 assistenciais e 30 gerentes. A maioria dos enfermeiros eram mulheres jovens, com especialização. Os escores totais do pré-teste revelaram média de 152,13 para enfermeiros gerentes e de 140,83 para assistenciais, sendo 190 o escore máximo possível. Conclusão: A Nursing Authority And Autonomy Scale foi considerada traduzida e adaptada ao contexto brasileiro. Outros estudos devem avaliar as qualidades psicométricas deste instrumento.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Copyright © | Todos os direitos reservados.
A revista detém os direitos autorais exclusivos de publicação deste artigo nos termos da lei 9610/98.
Reprodução parcial
É livre o uso de partes do texto, figuras e questionário do artigo, sendo obrigatória a citação dos autores e revista.
Reprodução total
É expressamente proibida, devendo ser autorizada pela revista.
Referências
2. ALRUWAILI MM e ABUADAS FH. Professional autonomy among nurses in Saudi Arabian critical care units. BMC Nurs, 2023; 22(1): 224.
3. AYALA R. Nursing, patriarchy and Society: the public-private fight that is now. Rev Urug Enferm, 2020; 15(1): 1-4.
4. BASARAN AS e DINÇ L. Turkish adaptation and psychometric characteristics of the Nursing Authority and Autonomy Scale. J Nurs Manag, 2018; 26(6): 735.
5. BEATON DE, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 2000; 25(24): 3186-91.
6. BEATON DE, et al. Recommendations for the cross-cultural adaptation of the DASH & QuickDASH outcome measures. Institute for Work & Health, 2007.
7. BLANCHFIELD KC e BIORDI DL. Power in practice: a study of nursing authority and autonomy. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 1996; 20(3): 42-49.
8. CASSIANI SHB e DIAS BM. Perspectives for advanced practice nursing in Brazil. Rev Esc Enferm USP, 2022; 56: 20210406.
9. COSTA RLM, et al. The professional autonomy of nursing in pandemic times. Rev Gaúcha de Enferm, 2021; 42: 20200404.
10. FORTES CPDD e ARAÚJO APQC. Check list for healthcare questionnaires cross-cultural translation and adaptation. Cad Saúde Colet, 2019; 27(2): 202-9.
11. GASPARINO RC e GUIRARDELLO EB. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the "Nursing Work Index - Revised" into Brazilian Portuguese. Acta Paul Enferm, 2009; 22(3): 281-7.
12. GASPARINO RC e GUIRARDELLO EB. Validation of the practice environment scale to the Brazilian culture. J Nurs Manag, 2017; 25(5): 375-83.
13. GASPARINO RC, et al. Validation of the Brazilian version of the Nursing Work Index-Revised (B-NWI-R). J Clin Nurs, 2011; 20(23-24): 3494-50.
14. GEOK TB, et al. Critical care nurses´autonomiy and authorithy in nursing practice. Journal of Malaysian Nurse Association, 2020; 14: 60-69.
15. GILES M, et al. How do nurse consultant job characteristics impact on job satisfaction? an Australian quantitative study. BMC Nursing, 2017; 16: 51.
16. GRINBERG K e SELA Y. Expanding nurses`authority - physicians`and nurses`attitudes. Appl Nurs Res, 2022; 63: 151550.
17. HARA Y, et al. The impact of changes in professional autonomy and occupational commitment on nurses’ intention to leave: a two-wave longitudinal study in Japan. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020; 17: 6120.
18. LABRAGUE LJ, et al. Predictors and outcomes of nurse professional autonomy: a cross-sectional study. Int J Nurs Pract, 2019; 25(1): 12711.
19. MAGNAGO C e PIERANTONI CR. Nursing training and their approximation to the assumptions of the National Curriculum Guidelines and Primary Health Care. Cien Saude Colet, 2020; 25(1): 15-24.
20. MAIER CB. Nurse prescribing of medicines in 13 European countries. Maier Human Resources for Health, 2019; 17: 95.
21. MCKENNA J e JESKE D. Ethical leadership and decision authority effects on nurses`engagement, exhaustion, and turnover intention. J Adv Nurs, 2021; 77(1): 198-206.
22. MOLDESTAD M, et al. Comparable, but distinct: perceptions of primary care provided by physicians and nurse practitioners in full and restricted practice authority states. J Adv Nurs, 2020; 76(11): 3092-3103.
23. PARK J, et al. To what extent are state scope of practice laws related to nurse practitioners’ day-to-day practice autonomy? Med Care Res Rev, 2018; 75(1): 67-87.
24. PERES MAA, et al. Professional Autonomy as Centrality in Best Practices in Nursing. Rev Bras Enferm, 2020; 73(2): 20180373.
25. PETRY S, et al. Autonomy of nursing and its trajectory in the construction of a profession. Hist Enferm Rev Eletr, 2019; 10(1): 66-75.
26. PURSIO K, et al. Professional autonomy in nursing: na integrative review. J Nurs Manag, 2021; 29: 1565–1577.
27. PÜSCHEL VAA, et al. Advanced Practice Nursing in Brazil: how are we and what is missing? Rev Esc Enferm USP, 2022; 56: 20210455.
28. RIBEIRO JP, et al. Productivity of subjectivity and autonomy of nursing professionals in Pediatrics. Rev Bras Enferm, 2019; 72: 41-8.
29. SILVA AV, et al. Cenário sociohistórico do código de ética, direitos e deveres do profissional de enfermagem no Brasil. REVISA, 2020; 9(3): 369-74.
30. TRISYANI Y e WINDSOR C. Expanding knowledge and roles for authority and practice boundaries of Emergency Department nurses: a grounded theory study. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being, 2019; 14(1): 1563429.
31. TÜRK G, et al. Autonomy Levels and Professional Attitudes of Nurse Educators. Florence Nightingal. J Nurs, 2021; 29(1): 22-29.